Intermodal learning in infancy: learning on the basis of two kinds of invariant relations in audible and visible events.

By Lorraine E. Bahrick. 1988

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Early Experience & Multisensory Perceptual Narrowing (2014, background): “…old) infants can perceive the synchronous relations between moving objects and the sounds that they produce (Bahrick, 1988; Lewkowicz, 1992a,b, 1994b, 1996), by this age they begin to perceive the specific composition of the objects that make up such audiovisual events as well (Bahrick, 1988).”
Infant perception of audio-visual speech synchrony. (2010, background): “For example, studies have shown that infants can perceive the temporal synchrony between the audible and the visible attributes of multisensory objects regardless of whether these are static or sounding objects (Lewkowicz, 1986), moving or sounding objects (Bahrick, 1988; Lewkowicz, 1992a, 1992b, 19”
Infants' response to temporally based intersensory equivalence: The effect of synchronous sounds on visual preferences for moving stimuli (1992, unknown): “In a second series of studies, Bahrick (1988) showed that infants younger than 4 months of age needed prior experience with such multimodal events before they exhibited a preference for the visual stimulus matching the sound.”
The development of infant learning about specific face-voice relations. (2005, background): “The present developmental findings are also consistent with an increasing specificity view of perceptual development (Bahrick, 2001, 2004; Gibson, 1969) and a growing body of research demonstrating that detection of arbitrary, modality-specific relations is guided and constrained by the detection of”
The temporal binding window for audiovisual speech: Children are like little adults (2016, background): “…work has shown that by four months of age babies can detect tempo, rhythm and synchrony in the auditory and visual modalities and can use these cues for crossmodal matching (Bahrick, 1983; Bahrick, 1987, 1988; Dodd, 1979; Lewkowicz, 1986, 1992, 1996, 2000; Mendelson & Ferland, 1982; Spelke, 1979).”
The development of infant discrimination of affect in multimodal and unimodal stimulation: The role of intersensory redundancy. (2007, background): “For example, infants perceive the synchrony, rhythm, and tempo common to visible and audible stimulation from events such as an object striking a surface (e.g., Bahrick, 1988, 1992; Bahrick, Flom, & Lickliter, 2002; Bahrick & Lickliter, 2000).”
Infants' perception of expressive behaviors: differentiation of multimodal information. (1997, background): “Infants appear to experience a world of perceptual unity (e.g., Bahrick, 1983, 1988; Dodd, 1979 ).”
The role of the mother's voice in developing mother's face preference: Evidence for intermodal perception at birth (2005, background): “Around this age, infants can also match appropriately the sounds made either by a single unitary element or by a cluster of smaller elements ( Bahrick, 1987, 1988 ).”
The role of intersensory redundancy in early perceptual, cognitive, and social development (2012, background): “Young infants show similar sensitivity to synchronous amodal information, even in the first months of life (e.g. Bahrick 1988 ; Lewkowicz 1996 ; Morrongiello et al. 1998 ).”
Development of multisensory spatial integration and perception in humans. (2006, background): “…contiguity of auditory and visual inputs (Lawson, 1980; Lyons-Ruth, 1977) while other studies indicate that infants as young as 3.5 months of age are insensitive to the spatial separation of auditory and visual inputs when temporally coincident (Bahrick, 1988; Lewkowicz, 1992; Spelke, 1979).”
Intersensory redundancy guides attentional selectivity and perceptual learning in infancy. (2000, background): “Prior research has emphasized the important role of the infant's capabilities for detecting amodal relations (Bahrick, 1988; Bahrick & Pickens, 1994; Gibson, 1969; Morrongiello, Fenwick, & Chance, 1998).”
Intermodal Perception and Selective Attention to Intersensory Redundancy: Implications for Typical Social Development and Autism (2010, background): “In contrast, after experiencing asynchronous impact sounds along with objects striking a surface, infants show no evidence of differentiating the sound, the appearance of the object, or learning the relations between them (Bahrick, 1988) .”
The development of intersensory temporal perception: an epigenetic systems/limitations view. (2000, background): “In general, empirical findings have shown that infants are sensitive and responsive to intersensory temporal synchrony (Bahrick, 1988; Lewkowicz, 1986, 1992a, 1992b, 1996b; Speike, 1988; Speike, Born, & Chu, 1983) and that responsiveness to it emerges very early in life.”
The development of infant intersensory perception: advantages of a comparative convergent-operations approach. (2000, background): “Bahrick (1988, 1992, 1994) likewise provides converging lines of evidence for the power of redundant (amodal) information in guiding and constraining early intersensory responsiveness.”