Infant perception of audio-visual speech synchrony.

By David J. Lewkowicz. 2010

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental Biology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental Biology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Multisensory Processes: A Balancing Act across the Lifespan (2016, background): “Furthermore, it has been shown that the TBW differs for different stimuli and tasks in infants [32,33], children [49], and adults [45], suggesting a dependence not only on physical stimulus characteristics but also on learned associations.”
Early Experience & Multisensory Perceptual Narrowing (2014, background): “…to rely on them for the perception of the multisensory coherence of a broad variety of multisensory events including light flashes and beeping sounds, moving and impacting objects, and audiovisual speech (Dixon & Spitz, 1980; Hillock-Dunn & Wallace, 2012; Lewkowicz, 2010; Lewkowicz & Flom, 2013).”
The Integrated Development of Sensory Organization (2011, background): “Such abilities are likely based on young infants' sensitivity to relatively low levels of intersensory relations, including intensity and temporal synchrony [10,11].”
Perception of the multisensory coherence of fluent audiovisual speech in infancy: its emergence and the role of experience. (2015, methodology): “The finding that the 4- and 8- to 10-month-old infants did not exhibit evidence of multisensory matching—even though they had access to synchronous auditory and visual inputs—might, at first blush, seem at odds with previous findings showing that infants are sensitive to A–V synchrony relations (Lew”
The Audio-Visual Temporal Binding Window Narrows In Early Childhood (2013, unknown): “Moreover, the stimulus events used here were the same as those used in a previous infant study (Lewkowicz, 2010).”
The temporal binding window for audiovisual speech: Children are like little adults (2016, background): “8 abilities mature over a protracted developmental timeline (e.g., Grant, van Wassenhove, & Poeppel, 2004; Hillock-Dunn & Wallace, 2012; Hillock et al., 2011; Lewkowicz, 1996; Lewkowicz, 2010; Lewkowicz & Flom, 2013; Munhall et al., 1996; van Wassenhove et al., 2007).”
The Biological Implausibility of the Nature-Nurture Dichotomy & What It Means for the Study of Infancy (2011, background): “Initially, because infants are sensitive to A-V synchrony cues from birth on (Lewkowicz, 2010; Lewkowicz, et al., 2010), they can begin to construct a coherent multisensory world, albeit a very crude and imprecise one.”
The Construct of the Multisensory Temporal Binding Window and its Dysregulation in Developmental Disabilities (2014, unknown): “(Lewkowicz, 1996b, 2000a, 2010)).”
Bilingualism Modulates Infants' Selective Attention to the Mouth of a Talking Face (2015, unknown): “Indeed, studies show that this general ability emerges in infancy (Kuhl & Meltzoff, 1982; Lewkowicz, 2010; Lewkowicz & Ghazanfar, 2006; Lewkowicz & Pons, 2013; Patterson & Werker, 1999; Pons, Lewkowicz, Soto-Faraco, & Sebastián-Gallés, 2009; Rosenblum, Schmuckler, & Johnson, 1997; Teinonen, Aslin,…”
Infants deploy selective attention to the mouth of a talking face when learning speech (2012, background): “These include the ability to detect the temporal coherence of faces and voices (27, 28), the ability to associate faces and voices (24, 28–31), and the ability to match and integrate the auditory and visual attributes of speech (32–35).”