Intersensory redundancy guides attentional selectivity and perceptual learning in infancy.

By Lorraine E. Bahrick, R. Lickliter. 2000

534 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sensory Systems

Citations in the corpus

Multisensory Processes: A Balancing Act across the Lifespan (2016, background): “For instance, starting at birth infants detect low-level, rudimentary multisensory correspondences based on simple cues such as intensity [27] and temporal synchrony [28,29] and fail to detect the specific multisensory identity of objects and events.”
Early Experience & Multisensory Perceptual Narrowing (2014, background): “…in the findings reviewed earlier showing that infants are sensitive to A- V asynchrony and that they can learn synchronous audiovisual events but not asynchronous ones (Bahrick, 1988; Bahrick & Lickliter, 2000; Lewkowicz, 1992a,b, 1996, 2000b, 2010; Lewkowicz et al., 2010; Scheier et al., 2003).”
The decline of cross-species intersensory perception in human infants: underlying mechanisms and its developmental persistence. (2008, background): “…synchronous over asynchronous audio-visual speech (Dodd, 1979), that they rely on intersensory temporal synchronywhen learningmultisensory events (Bahrick and Lickliter, 2000), and that they rely on intersensory temporal synchrony when they respond to multimodal emotional expressions…”
Benefits of multisensory learning. (2008, background): “For example, Bahrick and Lickliter [ 28 ] showed that 5-month-old infants could discriminate visually presented rhythms only if they were habituated with auditory–visual presentations of the rhythm and not when habituated with visual-only or auditory-only presentations of rhythm.”
Intermodal Perception and Selective Attention to Intersensory Redundancy: Implications for Typical Social Development and Autism (2010, background): “…sights and sounds rogether (providing intersensory redundancy) but not when they experienced the rhythm or tempo in one sense modality alone or when the sights and sounds were out of synchrony (providing no intersensory redundancy) (Bahrick & Lickliter, 2000; Bahrick, Flom, et al., 2002).”
The Audio-Visual Temporal Binding Window Narrows In Early Childhood (2013, unknown): “In addition, studies have found that audiovisual redundancy enhances speech comprehension in adults (Sumby & Pollack, 1954; Summerfield, 1979) and that it affects discriminative responsiveness and learning in infants (Bahrick & Lickliter, 2000; Lewkowicz, 1985, 1986, 1992).”
The development of infant learning about specific face-voice relations. (2005, background): “…sense modality alone (with no redundancy) facilitates perception of modality-specific properties of stimulation such as pitch and timbre of the voice or pattern and configuration of the face (see Bahrick, Flom, & Lickliter, 2002; Bahrick & Lickliter, 2000, 2002; Bahrick, Lickliter, & Flom, 2004).”
Responding to Joint Attention Across the 6- Through 24-Month Age Period and Early Language Acquisition (2000, background): “The plausibility of impact of this factor is supported by a considerable literature suggesting that auditory information contributes to the organization and depth of processing of visual attention (Bahrick & Lickliter, 1998; Smith, Quittner, Osberger, & Miyamoto, 1998).”
Synesthesia: a new approach to understanding the development of perception. (2013, background): “For example, infants as young as 3 weeks of age appear to understand the temporal synchrony between the sight of an object impacting a surface and the sound of the impact (Bahrick & Lickliter, 2000).”
The Integrated Development of Sensory Organization (2011, background): “The Salience of Intersensory Redundancy During Early Development To provide an organizing conceptual framework for defining the conditions that facilitate selective attention and perceptual learning during early development, Bahrick and Lickliter [34,35, 36] have proposed and provided converging evi”
Infant Categorization of Faces: Ladies First. (2005, unknown): “…link together information from across diVerent sensory modalities at a very early age and that infants are more likely to learn information via a combination of sensory pathways rather than through a single sensory pathway (the intersensory redundancy hypothesis; Bahrick & Lickliter, 2000, 2002).”
Infant perception of audio-visual speech synchrony. (2010, background): “…with one of the streams (Hollich, Newman, & Jusczyk, 2005), (d) take advantage of A-V synchrony to achieve more robust learning and discrimination (Bahrick & Lickliter, 2000; Lickliter, Bahrick, & Honeycutt, 2002, 2004; Walker-Andrews, 1986), and (e) associate synchronous faces and voices…”