Infants' response to temporally based intersensory equivalence: The effect of synchronous sounds on visual preferences for moving stimuli

By David J. Lewkowicz. 1992

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Early Experience & Multisensory Perceptual Narrowing (2014, background): “…young (3–4 months old) infants can perceive the synchronous relations between moving objects and the sounds that they produce (Bahrick, 1988; Lewkowicz, 1992a,b, 1994b, 1996), by this age they begin to perceive the specific composition of the objects that make up such audiovisual events as…”
Infants' perception of the audible, visible, and bimodal attributes of multimodal syllables. (2000, background): “(Dixon & Spitz, 1980; Massaro, 1998; McGrath & Summerfield, 1985; Radeau, 1994) and infants (Bahrick, 1992; Lewkowicz, 1992a, 1996b; Spelke, Born, & Chu, 1983; Walker, 1982) has shown that temporal AV relations contribute in important ways to intersensory integration.”
The Biological Implausibility of the Nature-Nurture Dichotomy & What It Means for the Study of Infancy (2011, result): “Previous studies using this procedure and similar stimuli, in which 4-month-old infants' ability to make auditory-visual (A-V) matches based on non-synaesthetic relations were investigated, have yielded evidence of matching (Lewkowicz, 1992).”
Intersensory Perception at Birth: Newborns Match Nonhuman Primate Faces and Voices. (2010, background): “…2 When the successful matching obtained in Experiment 1 is considered together with the fact that young infants can perceive AV synchrony relations (Lewkowicz, 1992, 1996, in press; Scheier, Lewkowicz, & Shimojo, 2003) and that detection of AV temporal synchrony is mediated by low-level,…”
Infant perception of audio-visual speech synchrony. (2010, background): “For example, studies have shown that infants can perceive the temporal synchrony between the audible and visible attributes of multisensory objects regardless of whether these are static/sounding objects (Lewkowicz, 1986), moving/sounding objects (Bahrick, 1988; Lewkowicz, 1992a, 1992b, 1996b; Sch”
Development of multisensory spatial integration and perception in humans. (2006, background): “…contiguity of auditory and visual inputs (Lawson, 1980; Lyons-Ruth, 1977) while other studies indicate that infants as young as 3.5 months of age are insensitive to the spatial separation of auditory and visual inputs when temporally coincident (Bahrick, 1988; Lewkowicz, 1992; Spelke, 1979).”
The decline of cross-species intersensory perception in human infants: underlying mechanisms and its developmental persistence. (2008, background): “This possibility is made all the more likely by the fact that infants as young as two months of age are sensitive to intersensory temporal synchrony relations (Bahrick, 1983; Dodd, 1979; Lewkowicz, 1986, 1992a, b, 1996, 2000b) and that they become sensitive to audio-visual duration relations betwee”
The temporal binding window for audiovisual speech: Children are like little adults (2016, background): “…work has shown that by four months of age babies can detect tempo, rhythm and synchrony in the auditory and visual modalities and can use these cues for crossmodal matching (Bahrick, 1983; Bahrick, 1987, 1988; Dodd, 1979; Lewkowicz, 1986, 1992, 1996, 2000; Mendelson & Ferland, 1982; Spelke, 1979).”
Intersensory experience and early perceptual development: the role of spatial contiguity in Bobwhite quail chicks' responsiveness to multimodal maternal cues. (1996, background): “In fact, as pointed out by Field (1987)’ much research on infants’ perception of auditory-visual events has relied on this tolerance of spatial disparity to explore other related characteristics of intersensory perception (e.g., Kuhl & Meltzoff, 1982; Lewkowicz, 1992; Spelke, 1979).”