When Good Brands Do Bad
By Jennifer L. Aaker, Susan Fournier, S. A. Brasel. 2004
1,618 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc643b53f908e7874e853e2c9eeb4c66be802442
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
- Arnold Japutra
- Marc Fetscherin
- Matthew Thomson
- Susan Fournier
- P. Aggarwal
- Linda D. Hollebeek
- D. Macinnis
- R. Rather
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Marc Fetscherin
- Arnold Japutra
- Matthew Thomson
- Susan Fournier
- Linda D. Hollebeek
- Allison R. Johnson
- T. M. Tripp
- P. Aggarwal
In Sociology and Political Science
- Linda D. Hollebeek
- Arnold Japutra
- Yany Grégoire
- Matthew Thomson
- R. Rather
- Marc Fetscherin
- Susan Fournier
- T. M. Tripp
Citations in the corpus
- Exploring positively- versus negatively-valenced brand engagement: a conceptual model (2014, background): “Hence instead, constructs gauging the interactive nature of consumer/brand relationships have been advocated (Aaker et al., 2004), with BE representing a prominent concept in both the managerial and scholarly discourse addressing the need for more effective marketing metrics (Marketing Science Insti”
- Complaining to the Masses: The Role of Protest Framing in Customer-Created Complaint Web Sites (2006, background): “Past work on consumer-firm relational transgressions (Aaker et al. 2004; Aggarwal 2004) has focused on how such transgressions hurt brand equity but not the betrayed consumer’s esteem.”
- An exploration of relational customers' response to service failure (2007, background): “Service failures can represent a form of brand‐relationship transgression (defined as an event that breaks the implied norms of the consumer‐brand relationship; Aaker et al., 2004).”