Entpreprenerial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge-Based Economic Development
By Janet E. L. Bercovitz, Maryann P. Feldman. 2006
873 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/55977270a257745db7015b1a029c33c68ec46a55
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Christopher S. Hayter
- Markus Perkmann
- Pablo D'Este
- Albert N. Link
- H. Bathelt
- Samantha R. Bradley
- Kathryn Walsh
- Helen Lawton Smith
In Strategy and Management
- Markus Perkmann
- Pablo D'Este
- Christopher S. Hayter
- Kathryn Walsh
- Dieter Franz Kogler
- A. Scandura
- Samantha R. Bradley
- Albert N. Link
Citations in the corpus
- University knowledge and firm innovation: evidence from European countries (2014, background): “However, despite growing linkages, European firms still exhibit a rather limited ability to commercialize new scientific knowledge, in comparison to their US or Japanese counterparts (Bergmam 2010; Lehrer et al. 2009; Owen-Smith et al. 2002; Mueller 2006).”
- Stylized Facts in the Geography of Innovation (2010, background): “This has a significant impact on local economic growth as university spin-off firms are frequently acknowledged as one of the key drivers of technological change and subsequent economic growth, leading to the development of economic successful regions (Bercovitz and Feldman 2006).”
- Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations (2009, background): “…inter-organizational relationships (e.g. joint research or contract research) to spin-off companies, to IP transfer including patenting and licensing (Bercovitz and Feldman, 2006; Bonaccorsi and Piccaluga, 1994; Carayol, 2003; Cohen et al., 2002; D'Este and Patel, 2007; Schartinger et al., 2002).”
- Collaboration Between Firms and Universities in Italy: The Role of a Firm’s Proximity to Top-Rated Departments (2014, positive): “This collaboration, together with the creation of human and social capital, can become a strong driver of local development (Breznitz and Feldman 2012; Feller and Feldman 2010; Bercovitz and Feldman 2006).”
- Engaging the scholar: Three types of academic consulting and their impact on universities and industry (2008, background): “Among these collaborative forms of interaction, academic consulting is widely practiced yet it appears largely uncaptured and unstudied (Bercovitz and Feldman, 2006; Cohen et al., 2002).”
- The strategic orientation of universities in knowledge transfer activities (2019, background): “…share the idea that creating a decentralized TTO within the university may be instrumental to securing a sufficient level of autonomy for developing relationships with industry (Bercovitz and Feldman 2006; Debackere and Veugelers, 2005; Goldfarb and Henrekson 2002; Rasmussen and Borch 2010).”
- The research university, entrepreneurship and regional development: Research propositions and current evidence (2012, background): “2004 ; Bercovitz and Feldman 2006 ), a variety of being entrepreneurial: ‘commercial’ or ‘connected’ (Kitson et al.”