Antecedents and Outcomes of Retaliation Against Whistleblowers: Gender Differences and Power Relationships

By Michael T. Rehg, Marcia P. Miceli, Janet P. Near, James R. Van Scotter. Organ. Sci., 2008

341 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb4eb99f7ed4a4001515feb1908d9a2f4bcb605a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

1. M. B. Nielsen
2. Hengky Latan
3. Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour
4. S. B. Matthiesen
5. Brita Bjørkelo
6. Christian M. Ringle
7. Staale Einarsen
8. Marko Sarstedt

In Social Psychology

1. Staale Einarsen
2. M. B. Nielsen
3. S. B. Matthiesen
4. Brita Bjørkelo
5. Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour
6. Hengky Latan
7. Christian M. Ringle
8. G. Notelaers

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Staale Einarsen
2. M. B. Nielsen
3. S. B. Matthiesen
4. Brita Bjørkelo
5. G. Notelaers
6. Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour
7. Hengky Latan
8. Christian M. Ringle

Citations in the corpus

• Silence is golden? Characteristics and experiences of self-reported whistleblowers (2011, background): “Some studies have also found that low whistleblower power is significantly related to retaliation (Rehg et al., 2008).”
• Whistleblowing Intentions Among Public Accountants in Indonesia: Testing for the Moderation Effects (2016, background): “Various studies have shown that retaliation or threat can hinder the whistleblower’s decision to report violations (Bedard et al. 2008; Liyanarachchi and Adler 2011; Miceli 2013; Rehg et al. 2008).”