5. Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development: A meta-analysis

By Eunhee Jeon, T. Kaya. 2006

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca01661b5cfc157a90b97beef9dddf29dea9b14a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

In Literature and Literary Theory

Citations in the corpus

The Role of Pragmatics in the Master's TESOL Curriculum: Findings From a Nationwide Survey (2009, background): “And, as both Rose (2005) and Jeon and Kaya (2006) point out, there are several methodological fl aws and limitations found in the existing research that will need to be overcome in future research on instructed pragmatics, before fi rmer conclusions can be drawn about the relative advantages of an…”
Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms (2012, background): “…than implicit instruction for improving learners’ use of difficult pragmatic structures that include speech acts such as refusals, invitations, requests, offers, suggestions, agreements, complaints, and apologies (see Jeon & Kaya 2006 for a meta-analysis; Kasper & Rose 2002 for a narrative review).”
Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going (2015, methodology): “Previous studies generally confirmed the superiority of the explicit over the implicit method (Jeon & Kaya 2006; Takahashi 2010a).”
Teaching Pragmatics: Trends and Issues (2011, background): “Recently, researchers have argued that selection of explicit and implicit conditions represents a continuum between absolutely explicit and implicit extremes rather than a dichotomy (Jeon & Kaya, 2006; Takahashi, 2010a, 2010b).”
Corpus Use in Language Learning: A Meta-Analysis. (2017, methodology): “To ensure harmonization, we applied our own criteria rather than adopting labels used in the original studies (cf. Jeon & Kaya, 2006), but still, like H. Lin (2014, p. 135), we often had to rely on “best guesses due to insufficient information given in the primary studies.””
The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (2018, methodology): “We are using the term ‘construction’ in the former sense.”