Language and the Mind

By John Field. 2005

1,109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9fbf2a6ce08cbcf60e38d891a8cd66804802cfc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Handbook of the history of social psychology (2012, background): “These studies dealt a body blow to work on the linguistic relativity hypothesis, as they suggested that color categories were due to the structure of the human visual system, chiming with the view that language learning was innate (Chomsky, 1968).”
The Bilingual Brain (2003, background): “, sets of possible grammatical and phonological variations (values) within a frame of invariant principles, are considered to be part of the innate endowment of Universal Grammar (Chomsky, 1968).”
Evolutionary Psychology as Maladapted Psychology (2007, background): “Noam Chomsky (1972, 70), probably the single most influential figure in the history of thought about human language, is striking for his dissent: As far as we know, possession of human language is associated with a specific type of mental organization, not simply a higher degree of intelligence.”
The developing brain and neural plasticity: Implications for normality, psychopathology, and resilience. (2015, background): “Often, the investigation of a system in its smoothly operating normal or healthy state does not afford the opportunity to comprehend the interrelations among its component systems (see, e.g., Caviness & Rakic, 1978; Chomsky, 1968).”
Conceptions of Professional Competence (2014, background): “Apart from professional domains there are other domains in which competence plays an important role are language and communication (Chomsky, 1965;1968; Canale and Swain, 1980), mathematics (Gelman and Greeno, 1989), intercultural communication (Hampden-Turner and Trompenaars, 2000), and life…”
Comprehension and production of French object clitics by child second language learners and children with specific language impairment (2005, background): “(Chomsky, 1972, p. 18) This view does not deny the existence of separate systems associated with the online processing involved in language production (see, e.g., Levelt, 1989) and language comprehension (e.g., Bishop, 1997).”
Connectionism and dynamic systems: are they really different? (2003, background): “Table 1 summarizes similarities and differences among the following theories: Chomsky’s (1968, 1975, 1988) nativist theory of language development (which has inspired nativist theories in other domains as well – for a discussion, see Fodor, 1983), E.J. Gibson’s (1969, 1988) theory of perception and ”
The Influence of Affect on Attitude (2005, background): “Isen, A. M., Shalker, T. E., Clark, M., & Karp, L. (1978).”
A Multilingual Perspective on Translanguaging (2017, background): “A phrase structure grammar, which was a component of a generative-transformational grammar as developed in Chomsky (1957, 1965), is a system of rules that ‘‘recursively enumerates structural descriptions of sentences’’ (Chomsky, 1968, p. 165) to capture the creative aspect of language use.”
Dynamic Systems Theories (2007, background): “Chomsky (and nativism) seems to be left out, but is he really? There are explicit formal theories of change in dynamic systems consistent with a triggering mechanism of change. Specifically, Yamauchi and Beer (1994) showed how the dynamics of continuous time recurrent networks can generate highly di”
Beyond babytalk: Re-evaluating the nature and content of speech input to preverbal infants (2007, background): “The idea that the input to infants might underspecify the adult grammar (the Poverty of the Stimulus) is of concern to linguists even with the whole range of speech as input (Chomsky, 1968/1972; Chomsky & Hampshire, 1968).5 If infants are limited only to ID and CD speech, the problem is even worse.”
Classification System for English Language Learners: Issues and Recommendations (2008, background): “For example, according to Chomsky (1968) language is modeled by internal factors and then shaped through experience. Similarly, Krashen (1988) suggests that humans are born with the ability to learn language (see also Lightbown & Spada, 2000).”
The Tree of Knowledge System and the Theoretical Unification of Psychology (2003, background): “Problem of Justification Although there have been a few notable dissenters (e.g., Chomsky, 1972; Gould, 1987), most evolutionists and psycholinguists agree that human capacity for language evolved through the process of natural selection (e.g., Deacon, 1997; Pinker, 1994).”