Managing Tacit and Explicit Knowledge Transfer in Ijvs: The Role of Relational Embeddedness and the Impact on Performance
By C. Dhanaraj, Marjorie A. Lyles, H. Kevin Steensma, Laszlo Tihanyi. 2004
1,071 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9b3228939f22f96c71e8718d9c072999e049466
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- K. Meyer
- Mike W. Peng
- Mike Wright
- Rajneesh Narula
- D. Tan
- Grazia D. Santangelo
- Rudolf R. Sinkovics
- Marjorie A. Lyles
In Strategy and Management
- K. Meyer
- Mike W. Peng
- Rajneesh Narula
- Mike Wright
- D. Tan
- Grazia D. Santangelo
- G. Mcdermott
- Henk W. Volberda
Citations in the corpus
- Location, collocation and R&D alliances in the European ICT industry (2009, background): “…of learning (Kale et al. 2000, Lane et al. 2001, Dhanaraj et al. 2004) by acting as a facilitator in the transfer of tacit knowledge between firms (Dhanaraj et al. 2004), However, these arguments fail to make the explicit link between spatial location and the choice of partners in R&D alliances,…”
- Dynamic capability and IJV performance: The effect of exploitation and exploration capabilities (2013, background): “Many research building on the seminal study of Lyles and Salk (1996) and the continuing work (e.g., Dhanaraj, Lyles, Steensma, & Tihanyi, 2004; Lane et al., 2001; Steensma & Lyles, 2000) essentially replicate or modify or extend the original model of Lyles and Salk (1996), which is focused on vari”
- Performance of International Joint Ventures: What Factors Really Make a Difference and How? (2009, background): “Also, relational embeddedness between IJV and parent firms will play a pivotal role in an IJV’s learning and performance (Dhanaraj et al., 2004).”
- Knowledge Sharing in Teams (2014, background): “These definitions capture a distinction that has been made in measures of explicit and tacit knowledge with respect to both content and the means by which these types of knowledge are shared (Dhanaraj et al., 2004; Haua & Evangelista, 2007). For example, Haua and Evangelista’s (2007) items reflected”
- Country-of-origin and industry FDI agglomeration of foreign investors in an emerging economy (2011, background): “ability to exchange such tacit knowledge depends, to a large extent, on the quality of the relationship between the two organizations because successful exchange requires two-way communication between the individuals possessing and receiving the knowledge (Dhanaraj et al., 2004; Hansen, 1999).”
- The impact of buyer–supplier relationships on supplier innovativeness: An empirical study in cross-border supply networks (2013, background): “, Dyer & Nobeoka, 2000; Liker & Choi, 2004) by sharing their own knowledge assets with the first-tier suppliers (Dyer & Hatch, 2006), compared to lower-tier supply networks, interfirm routines between an international OEM buyer and a first-tier supplier may provide more opportunities for the first-t”
- Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity (2009, background): “Dhanaraj et al. (2004) identify the importance of social embeddedness in transferring tacit and explicit knowledge.”
- Inter-Organizational Knowledge Transfer: Current Themes and Future Prospects (2008, background): “Trust facilitates knowledge transfer by creating a sense of security that the knowledge in question will not be exploited beyond what is initially intended (Dhanaraj et al., 2004).”
- Knowledge Creation Through External Venturing: Evidence from the Telecommunications Equipment Manufacturing Industry (2006, background): “Highly embedded relationships between organizations allow for richer communication, which in turn results in feedback mechanisms, proper interpretation of procedures, and accurate and effective transfer of tacit knowledge ( Dhanaraj, Lyles, Steensma, & Tihanyi, 2004 ).”