Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity

By Henk W. Volberda, N. J. Foss, Marjorie A. Lyles. 2009

1,097 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The purpose of this Perspective Paper is to advance understanding of absorptive capacity, its underlying dimensions, its multi-level antecedents, its impact on firm performance and the contextual factors that affect absorptive capacity. Nineteen years after the Cohen and Levinthal 1990 paper, the field is characterized by a wide array of theoretical perspectives and a wealth of empirical evidence. In this paper, we first review these underlying theories and empirical studies of absorptive capacity. Given the size and diversity of the absorptive capacity literature, we subsequently map the existing terrain of research through a bibliometric analysis. The resulting bibliometric cartography shows the major discrepancies in the organization field, namely that (1) most attention so far has been focused on the tangible outcomes of absorptive capacity; (2) organizational design and individual level antecedents have been relatively neglected in the absorptive capacity literature; and (3) the emergence of absorptive capacity from the actions and interactions of individual, organizational and inter-organizational antecedents remains unclear. Building on the bibliometric analysis, we develop an integrative model that identifies the multi-level antecedents, process dimensions, and outcomes of absorptive capacity as well as the contextual factors that affect absorptive capacity. We argue that realizing the potential of the absorptive capacity concept requires more research that shows how “micro antecedents” and “macro- antecedents” influence future outcomes such as competitive advantage, innovation, and firm performance. In particular, we identify conceptual gaps that may guide future research to fully exploit the absorptive capacity concept in the organization field and to explore future fruitful extensions of the concept.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f1cdc50b0b714f8943e6b61217b54ba0886efef3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

  1. Ammon J. Salter
  2. Keld Laursen
  3. Torben Pedersen
  4. Ivan Zupic
  5. Tomaž Čater
  6. Elizabeth L. Rose
  7. Omid Aliasghar
  8. A. Sadeghi

In Strategy and Management

  1. Keld Laursen
  2. N. J. Foss
  3. Ammon J. Salter
  4. Torben Pedersen
  5. Anabel Fernández-Mesa
  6. Oliver Alexy
  7. Joaquín Alegre
  8. Ellen Enkel

Citations in the corpus