Aureobasidium pullulans (LS-30) an antagonist of postharvest pathogens of fruits: study on its modes of action
By R. Castoria, F. Curtis, G. Lima, L. Caputo, S. Pacifico, V. Cicco. 2001
249 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cell Biology, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7f29a1bedd48935afa48cf85de659da015fe400
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cell Biology
In Plant Science
- L. Schena
- S. Tian
- A. Ippolito
- Franco Nigro
- L. Korsten
- K. A. El-Tarabily
- K. Sivasithamparam
- D. Spadaro
Citations in the corpus
- Selection and evaluation of new antagonists for their efficacy against postharvest brown rot of peaches (2010, background): “A. pullulans has been reported to act against 417 fungal pathogens through competition for nutrients (Bencheqroun et al., 2007), secretion of 418 exochitinase and β-1,3-glucanase (Castoria et al., 2001), or induction of defence responses (Ippolito 419 et al., 2000).”
- Biological control strategies of mycotoxigenic fungi and associated mycotoxins in Mediterranean basin crops (2012, background): “Castoria et al. (2001), in experiments with grapes, showed that strain LS-30 of A. pullulans reduced A. niger infections by approximately 86% after storage at 20°C for six days.”
- Control of postharvest rots of sweet cherries and table grapes with endophytic isolates of Aureobasidium pullulans (2003, background): “pullulans against postharvest rots as widely reported (Leibinger et al., 1997; Ippolito et al., 1997; Lima et al., 1997, 1999; Wittig et al., 1997; Schena et al., 1999; Castoria et al., 2001) and indicate some possible additional advantages in the use of endophytes.”
- Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits. (2002, background): “pullulans, effective in controlling various decays on apple, table grape, and other fruits (25, 76).”
- Modes of Action of Pantoea agglomerans CPA-2, an Antagonist of Postharvest Pathogens on Fruits (2003, background): “, 1998) and Aureobasidium pullulans (Janisiewicz et al., 2000; Castoria et al., 2001).”
- Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables by microbial antagonists: A review (2009, background): “: Fries, Penicillium expansum Link, Rhizopus stolonifer, and Aspergillus niger van Tieghem infecting table grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) and Botrytis cinerea and Penicillium expansum on apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) fruit (Castoria et al., 2001).”
- Interaction of antagonistic yeasts against postharvest pathogens of apple fruit and possible mode of action (2005, unknown): “Some antagonist-based products are commercially available and others are currently under varying degrees of development (Castoria et al., 2001).”
- Effects of pre- and post-harvest application of salicylic acid or methyl jasmonate on inducing disease resistance of sweet cherry fruit in storage (2005, background): “However, the development of fungici resistance by pathogens and increasing environ tal concern over fungicidal residues in fruit and v etables have stimulated a search for alternative sures for disease control (Holmes and Eckert, 199 Castoria et al., 2001; Fan and Tian, 2001; Zhan al., 2002).”
- Biosuppression of Botrytis cinerea in grapes (2006, background): “cinerea on table grapes (Lima et al., 1996, 1997; Castoria et al., 2001).”
- Potential of yeasts as biocontrol agents of soil-borne fungal plant pathogens and as plant growth promoters (2006, background): “…1984; Droby et al. 1989; Filonow 1998; Janisiewicz et al. 2000), production of cell wall-degrading enzymes such as β-1,3-glucanase and chitinase (Castoria et al. 2001; Masih and Paul 2002; Urquhart and Punja 2002), production of antifungal diffusible and volatile metabolites (Walker et al.…”