Modes of Action of Pantoea agglomerans CPA-2, an Antagonist of Postharvest Pathogens on Fruits

By L. Poppe, S. Vanhoutte, M. Höfte. European journal of plant pathology, 2003

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Combined application of antagonist Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and essential oils for the control of peach postharvest diseases (2010, background): “Poppe et al. (2003) reported the absence of induced resistance in citrus fruit treated with Pantoea agglomerans CPA-2 (biocontrol agent) against Penicillium digitatum and Penicillium italicum.”
Biological Control of Plant Pathogens: A Global Perspective (2022, background): “This competition mechanism is described in various biocontrol studies with various antagonists such as Pantoea agglomerans [118], Serratia plymuthica [118], and Aureobasidium pullulans [119].”
Biological control of postharvest diseases by microbial antagonists: how many mechanisms of action? (2016, methodology): “In fact, with this technique, it was possible to observe how Pantoea agglomerans CPA-2 prevented conidia germination at low but not at higher nutrient concentrations, indicating that the competition for nutrients can play a role in disease control at low but not at high nutrient concentrations (Popp”
Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruit (2011, methodology): “…antagonists such as Aureobasidium pullulans (Bencheqroun et al. 2007), Cryptococcus humicola (Filonow et al. 1996), Debaryomyces hansenii (Chalutz et al. 1988), Metschnikowia pulcherrima (Saravanakumar et al. 2008), P. agglomerans (Poppe et al. 2003) or Rhodotorula glutinis (Castoria et al. 1997).”