It's in the mind of the beholder: The impact of stereotypic associations on category-based and individuating impression formation.

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Implicit Ingroup Favoritism, Outgroup Favoritism, and Their Behavioral Manifestations (2004, background): “…that implicit prejudice toward Turks not only made people render negative evaluations of a Turkish person’s current behavior, but it also led them to make more definitive dispositional attributions about that person’s future actions than they did when the person was German (Gawronski et al., 2003).”
Getting Explicit About the Implicit (2012, background): “For more on how to calculate the reliability of both reaction time– and signal detection–based implicit measures, see Greenwald et al. (1998), Nosek and Banaji (2001), and Correll, Park, Judd, and Wittenbrink (2002).”
Implicit bias in impression formation: associations influence the construal of individuating information (2003, background): “Gawronski et al. (2003), for example, demonstrated that a target’s category membership affected the ascription of stereotypical traits only when perceivers had strong stereotypical associations.”
The Implicit Association Test and sociolinguistic meaning (2012, background): “More promising for sociolinguistic questions, Gawronski et al., 2003 showed that IAT-measured gender stereotypes predicted patterns of impression formation based on gender and individuating information.”