The Feasibility of Single-Item Measures for Organizational Justice

By Jeremy Jordan, B. Turner. 2008

94 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6259a5670be4bf08c13537a7e62bf9291411d0b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Thomas Goetz
2. Romain Martin
3. F. Preckel
4. Reinhard Pekrun

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Thomas Goetz
2. Antoine Fischbach
3. Romain Martin
4. K. Gogół
5. Sonja Ugen
6. Ulrich Keller
7. Martin Brunner
8. F. Preckel

In Social Psychology

1. F. Preckel
2. Thomas Goetz
3. Martin Brunner
4. Reinhard Pekrun
5. Nathan C. Hall
6. A. Frenzel
7. Chengchen Li
8. Lia M. Daniels

Citations in the corpus

• eSport vs. Sport: A Comparison of Spectator Motives (2018, unknown): “Multi-item and single-item measures have been found to offer comparable levels of reliability and validity (Jordan & Turner, 2008), which suggests a single-item approach may be efficient and effective.”
• “My Questionnaire is Too Long!” The assessments of motivational-affective constructs with three-item and single-item measures (2014, background): “Specifi cally, long scale scores may represent all facets that constitute the construct, whereas the assessment of a construct with a single item makes it impossible to differentiate between subfacets of a construct (Jordan & Turner, 2008).”