Are Firms Superior to Alliances and Markets? An Empirical Test of Cross-Border Knowledge Building

By Paul Almeida, Jaeyong Song, Robert M. Grant. Organ. Sci., 2002

485 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c53edbe71b3e0e8ac41f3e3d61abc89eff40fb45

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Network embeddedness and new-venture internationalization: Analyzing international linkages in the German biotech industry (2008, unknown): “Overall, firms develop international alliances to draw upon country-specific knowledge (Almeida et al., 2002) that can be used for exploration or exploitation (Coombs et al.”
Internationalization Knowledge: What, Why, Where, and When? (2013, background): “…improving their assessments of the resources required for success, firms may leverage IK to develop competitive advantage over domestic competitors (Almeida, Song, and Grant 2002; Knight and Liesch 2002; Prashantham and Young 2011; Roth et al. 2009) and achieve superior international market…”
The theoretical foundations of knowledge management (2006, background): “Building from knowledge alliances, new concepts focused on multinational corporations (Almeida et al ., 2002) and knowledge networks (Inkpen & Tsang, 2005).”
Internal Versus External Knowledge Sourcing Of Subsidiaries - An Organizational Trade-Off (2003, background): “Thus, the competitive advantage that MNCs enjoy is contingent upon their ability to facilitate and manage inter-subsidiary knowledge transfers (Kogut & Zander, 1992; Almeida et al., 2002).”
International Entrepreneurship: A Meta–Analysis on the Internationalization and Performance Relationship (2018, background): “…entrepreneurial firms to novel ideas from foreign markets (Bruneel, Yli-Renko, & Clarysse, 2010; Hitt et al., 1997) enabling frequent foreign knowledge integration that takes full advantage of knowledge-intense firms’ superior knowledge integration capacities (Almeida et al., 2002; Autio et al.).”
Does Ownership Structure Matter for Firm Technological Innovation Performance? The Case of Korean Firms (2012, unknown): “We followed the approach of Hausman, Hall, and Griliches (1984) and Blundell, Griffith, and Reenen (1995), specifically their frameworks for studying the number of patents in general, and the empirical applications of Almeida et al. (2002) and Chang et al.”
Knowledge transfer capacity and its implications for the theory of the multinational corporation (2003, methodology): “Combinations of quantitative and qualitative methods can be used when researching knowledge transfer performance (e.g., Almeida et al., 2002).”
The Architecture and Design of Organizational Capabilities (2006, unknown): “For instance, it may be that physical proximity is a substitute for common ownership, as in the Silicon Valley (Saxenian, 1999); and it also may be the case that within firms some types of knowledge transfer are harder than across firms (Almeida et al., 2002).”
Building Dynamic Capabilities: Innovation Driven by Individual-, Firm-, and Network-Level Effects (2007, background): “To understand the role of intellectual human capital in a firm’s ability to build new capabilities, researchers have highlighted the emergence of tacit knowledge resulting from the interaction of highly skilled human capital (Almeida et al. 2002, Kogut and Zander 1992). As an example, Henderson and ”