Off-Line Metacognition — A Domain-Specific Retardation in Young Children with Learning Disabilities?

By A. Desoete, Herbert Roeyers. 2002

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c40460fe79d2526e8f9689daa5af216ddbb2e27e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. G. Özsoy
2. A. Clercq
3. A. Desoete
4. Herbert Roeyers

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. G. Özsoy
2. A. Desoete
3. Herbert Roeyers
4. A. Clercq
5. M. Schneider
6. Cordula Artelt
7. Steven I. Higgins
8. Louise Gascoine

In Statistics and Probability

1. G. Özsoy
2. A. Desoete
3. Herbert Roeyers
4. A. Clercq
5. M. Schneider
6. Cordula Artelt
7. Steven I. Higgins
8. Louise Gascoine

Citations in the corpus

• Can offline metacognition enhance mathematical problem solving (2003, methodology): “Moreover, Cronbach’s alpha reliability analyses revealed alphas of .74, .89, and .85 for Pr, mathematical cognition, and Ev, respectively, for the total test (80 items; Desoete & Roeyers, 2002).”
• An investigation of the relationship between metacognition and mathematics achievement (2011, background): “The literature focuses on four metacognitive control skills; prediction, planning, monitoring and evaluation (Brown 1980; Desoete et al. 2001a; Desoete and Roeyers 2002; Lucangeli and Cornoldi 1997).”