Food crises, food regimes and food movements: rumblings of reform or tides of transformation?
By Eric Holt Giménez, Annie Shattuck. Journal of Peasant Studies, 2011
851 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Plant Science, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/206c8e9d149ae689109b671b5c2a3075bc1b4f79
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- I. Scoones
- R. Sonnino
- J. Vivero-Pol
- Adanella Rossi
- R. Hall
- Saturnino M. Borras Jr.
- Wendy Wolford
- B. White
In Plant Science
In Sociology and Political Science
- P. Tittonell
- I. Scoones
- Saturnino M. Borras Jr.
- B. White
- Wendy Wolford
- M. Mourad
- H. Renting
- Alison Blay-Palmer
Citations in the corpus
- The interconnected challenges for food security from a food regimes perspective: Energy, climate and malconsumption (2013, background): “Others identify the global grain and agri-chemical companies that, in their respective sectors exercise very high degrees of market concentration (Holt Gimenéz and Shattuck 2011; Hendrickson and Heffernan 2007).”
- The Long Green Revolution (2013, background): “Peasants, even the Iranians who become components ‘of the global food regime and of capital and the world historical value relations of the late nineteenth century’ (Araghi 2003, 57), have resisted and continue to resist the great enclosure (Holt Giménez and Shattuck 2011).”
- Food as Commons or Commodity? Exploring the Links between Normative Valuations and Agency in Food Transition (2017, background): “as “revolutionary” [115], and Holt-Gimenez and Shattuck as “radical” [33].”
- Building Food Democracy: Exploring Civic Food Networks and Newly Emerging Forms of Food Citizenship (2012, background): “Interviewees recall a meeting, held in Washington D.C. in 2009, at which the statement ‘Ending Poverty by Rebuilding Local Food Economies’ was developed as the key message of the food sovereignty 440 Noha Shawki movement (interviews 1, 2, 3, 10, 11).12 This was the meeting that set the stage for the”
- The transition movement and food sovereignty: From local resilience to global engagement in food system transformation (2014, neutral): “Recent work has begun to identify a matrix of ideological approaches to the food system (Holt-Giménez and Shattuck, 2011a, 2011b; Holt-Giménez and Wang, 2011; Holt-Giménez and Patel 2009).”
- Contextualising land grabbing: contemporary land deals, the global subsistence crisis and the world food system (2012, background): “Nonetheless, the sheer magnitude of the proposed arrangement brought out of the shadows and into the spotlight of international headlines a process that had been, according to the international nongovernmental organisation GRAIN (2008), underway since 2006: ‘land grabbing,’ in which “corporations an”
- Recycling, recovering and preventing “food waste”: competing solutions for food systems sustainability in the United States and France (2016, background): “Interestingly, the emerging movement to address food waste transcends typical dichotomies in food politics, such as public vs. private orNGOs and socialmovements vs. companies (Holt Gim enez and Shattuck, 2011; Schurman and Munro, 2010).”
- Transformational capacity and the influence of place and identity (2012, background): “Other attempts at major transformations have been less successful or have even turned out to be maladaptive [20]; examples include the de-linking of community from government, or food crises during periods of political stagnation [21].”
- Global Land Grabbing and Trajectories of Agrarian Change: A Preliminary Analysis (2012, background): “…the past couple of decades: a more or less integrated ‘food–energy– land sovereignty’ strategic alternative (both as a broad idea and as local initiatives) has widespread purchase among civil society activists and their allies in the academic world (Holt-Gimenez and Shattuck 2011; Patel 2009).”
- A food politics of the possible? Growing sustainable food systems through networks of knowledge (2016, background): “Food systems are compromised through climate change, food waste, philanthropy capitalism, food-for-fuel, freemarket trade and land grabbing (Friedmann 1993; Morgan and Sonnino 2010; Holt Giménez and Shattuck 2011; Akram-Lodhi 2012; Borras and Franco 2012; Lappe et al. 2013; Clapp 2014).”
- Agroecology, Food Sovereignty, and the New Green Revolution (2012, background): “Holt-Giménez and Shattuck (2011) identify Neoliberal and Reformist trends within the corporate food regime.”
- The new enclosures: critical perspectives on corporate land deals (2012, background): “Large-scale land deals, while sensational, are only the most recent and visible manifestation of a growing agrarian crisis around the world, reflected in heightened 7Among many critical views on the World Bank Report, see particularly Akram-Lodhi 2008 and Li 2009. levels of food insecurity, poverty,”
- Sustainable Food Security: An Emerging Research and Policy Agenda (2014, background): “For this reason, the productivist view of food insecurity tends to be supported by the most powerful actors in the food system – including the World Bank, the WTO and FAO (Mooney and Hunt, 2009; Holt Giménez and Shattuck, 2011).”