Optimising Learning Using Flashcards: Spacing Is More Effective Than Cramming
By Nate Kornell. 2009
325 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf02814fa256eaabae8cce26edff5a17e5514727
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- John Dunlosky
- Robert A. Bjork
- Sean H. K. Kang
- Katherine A. Rawson
- Nate Kornell
- Kalif E. Vaughn
- Michelle L. Rivers
- J. V. van Merriënboer
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Sean H. K. Kang
- John Dunlosky
- Kalif E. Vaughn
- Nate Kornell
- Katherine A. Rawson
- Robert A. Bjork
- D. Rohrer
Citations in the corpus
- Spaced Repetition Promotes Efficient and Effective Learning (2016, background): “Incorporating spaced repetitions into existing educational practice is feasible and has great potential to produce gains to learning without requiring added resources (time or money).”
- The Power of Successive Relearning: Improving Performance on Course Exams and Long-Term Retention (2013, background): “Of particular interest here, spacing has larger and longer-lasting effects on retentionwhen practice trials for a given item are distributed across days versus within a session (e.g., Cepeda et al. 2006; Kornell 2009).”
- Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions. (2013, background): “For instance, across multiple experiments, Kornell (2009) reported that 90% of the college student participants had better performance after spacing than massing practice.”
- How Retrieval Attempts Affect Learning: A Review and Synthesis (2016, background): “Kornell (2014) investigated the benefits of attempting to answer memorable but largely unknown trivia questions (eg, Q: What was the first state to allow women to vote?”