Toward a Unified Science of Hierarchy: Dominance and Prestige are Two Fundamental Pathways to Human Social Rank

By Joey T. Cheng, Jessica L. Tracy. 2014

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a116ee33790ac23387e9018c97974a8fc9499100

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Eric Hehman
2. Jon K. Maner
3. J. Pek
4. J. Flake

In Social Psychology

1. Eric Hehman
2. Jon K. Maner
3. J. Pek
4. J. Flake
5. H. Mohajan
6. Andrew F. Hayes
7. Jacob J Coutts

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Eric Hehman
2. Jon K. Maner
3. J. Flake

Citations in the corpus

• Dominance and Prestige: A Tale of Two Hierarchies (2017, background): “People’s substantive contributions accounted for the link between prestige and their level of influence, but dominant people exerted influence apparently because they talked more and were more assertive (Cheng & Tracy, 2014; cf. Anderson & Kilduff, 2009).”
• Construct Validation in Social and Personality Research (2017, background): “For example, the construct of status includes multiple dimensions, such as wealth, social affiliation, and prestige (Cheng & Tracy, 2014), which would be difficult to capture with a short scale.”