What Did You Expect? An Examination of Career-Related Support and Social Support Among Mentors and Protégés

By Angela M. Young, Pamela L. Perrewé. 2000

245 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/baaf78d24154c52e11746ebc18dbfd0dbae8a354

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Tammy D. Allen
2. L. Eby
3. B. R. Ragins
4. K. Kram
5. Dawn Chandler
6. Jeffrey Yip
7. John J. Sosik
8. M. Butts

In Education

1. Tammy D. Allen
2. L. Eby
3. Dawn Chandler
4. K. Kram
5. B. R. Ragins
6. Jeffrey Yip
7. Melenie J. Lankau
8. L. Waters

In Social Psychology

1. Tammy D. Allen
2. L. Eby
3. B. R. Ragins
4. K. Kram
5. Dawn Chandler
6. Jeffrey Yip
7. M. Butts
8. T. Scandura

Citations in the corpus

• Toward a Useful Theory of Mentoring (2007, background): “…focuses on a more formal type of relationship between a senior member of an organization and a novice, in part, to address the growing emphasis organizations are placing on formal types of mentoring in the socialization and career development of many professionals” (Young & Perrewe, 2000, p. 613).”
• Protégé--Mentor Agreement about the Provision of Psychosocial Support: The Mentoring Relationship, Personality, and Workload (2004, background): “Research into the outcomes of mentoring for the mentors themselves is still in its relative infancy (Mullen & Noe, 1999; Young & Perrewe, 2000).”
• Mentoring in sports coaching: a review of the literature (2009, background): “The key here then lies in meeting the mentee’s expectations in terms of supportive behaviour by the mentor (Young and Perrewé 2000).”
• Relationships at Work: Toward a Multidimensional Conceptualization of Dyadic Work Relationships (2009, background): “Overall, then, the mentoring process is a dyadic exchange/process relationship through which the mentor and the protégé exchange information, knowledge, support, and resources (Young & Perrewé, 2000a).”
• An Ecological Systems Perspective on Mentoring at Work: A Review and Future Prospects (2011, methodology): “This relational approach to mentoring urges scholars to examine the cognitive and affective processes underlying mentoring that have not yet been explicated by the social exchange approach used to describe traditional mentoring relationships (Young & Perrewé, 2000a, 2004).”
• Toward a Holistic View of Undergraduate Research Experiences: An Exploratory Study of Impact on Graduate/Postdoctoral Mentors (2009, background): “Other studies have revealed unclear or incompatible expectations as a source of interpersonal difficulties in mentoring relationships (Young and Perrewé 2000).”
• Protégés’ and mentors’ reactions to participating in formal mentoring programs: A qualitative investigation (2005, background): “The idea of met expectations is discussed in the mentoring literature as a predictor of relationship effectiveness and trust in mentoring relationships (Young & Perrewé, 2000).”
• The mediating influence of role stressors in the relationship between mentoring and job attitudes (2006, background): “Young and Perrewé (2000) found that mentors’ and protégés’ perceptions of met expectations of the other member of the dyad mediated the relationship between mentoring functions and relationship quality.”
• Mentoring Relationships From the Perspective of the Mentor (2007, background): “Young and Perrewe (2000) found that mentors were more satisfied when proteges were open to advisement and coaching and put forth effort in accomplishing work.”