Technology characteristics and reverse technology transfer
By Lars Håkanson. 2000
132 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b9ae189492a6b3f3a194c2b38c23fd767fc91949
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Ram Mudambi
- John A. Cantwell
- Lucia Piscitello
- L. Rabbiosi
- Grazia D. Santangelo
- Rajneesh Narula
- Jeffrey Cummings
- S. Holmberg
Citations in the corpus
- Best-fit Alliance Partners: The Use of Critical Success Factors in a Comprehensive Partner Selection Process (2012, background): “…visits, meetings and other activities that allow individuals to engage in what Polanyi termed “indwelling” have been found to enhance learning and allow for better communications among partners (Polanyi, 1966; Berry and Broadbent, 1984; Almeida, 1996; Galbraith, 1990; Hakanson and Nobel, 1998).”
- Parent Company Benefits from Reverse Knowledge Transfer: The Role of the Liability of Newness in MNEs (2011, methodology): “A similar variable has previously been used in studies on RKT by Håkanson and Nobel (2001), Yamin and Otto (2004) and Yang et al.”
- Reverse knowledge transfer in MNEs: : subsidiary innovativeness and entry modes (2014, background): “A substantial body of research in international business has investigated the relationship between a range of subsidiary characteristics and reverse knowledge transfers (e.g., Ambos et al., 2006; Gupta and Govindarajan, 2000; Håkanson and Nobel, 2000; Rabbiosi, 2011; Yang et al., 2008).”
- MNE competence‐creating subsidiary mandates (2005, background): “Thus, subsidiaries with competence-creating mandates tap into the munificence of their specific location (Pearce, 1999; Andersson and Forsgren, 2000; Ensign et al., 2000; Håkanson and Nobel, 2000).”