An Examination of the Influence of Diversity and Stakeholder Role on Corporate Social Orientation

By Wanda J. Smith, Richard E. Wokutch, K. Harrington, Bryan S. Dennis. 2001

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b72054b9eb6c90d39e9eccb26e271a509d8fcc1f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

1. France Bélanger
2. A. W. Dusuki
3. Stephen Brammer
4. Dane K. Peterson
5. A. Millington
6. Bruce A. Rayton
7. A. Lindgreen
8. V. Swaen

In Marketing

1. A. W. Dusuki
2. Stephen Brammer
3. A. Millington
4. V. Swaen
5. Dane K. Peterson
6. France Bélanger
7. Janine S. Hiller
8. Bruce A. Rayton

In Strategy and Management

1. Stephen Brammer
2. A. W. Dusuki
3. A. Millington
4. Bruce A. Rayton
5. V. Swaen
6. Dane K. Peterson
7. France Bélanger
8. Janine S. Hiller

Citations in the corpus

• The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment (2007, background): “While men are seen to place greater emphasis on instrumental or economic concerns women are more likely to be concerned with discretionary behaviour within the organization (Ibrahim and Angelidis, 1994; Smith et al., 2001).”
• The Relationship between Perceptions of Corporate Citizenship and Organizational Commitment (2004, background): “Measurements based on the observable outcomes in these four categories are generally viewed as a useful way to conceptualize CSR and to investigate how social performance relates to other variables (W. J. Smith et al., 2001).”
• Trustworthiness in electronic commerce: the role of privacy, security, and site attributes (2002, background): “A similar dimensional distinction can be found in the corporate social responsibility literature (Carroll, 1979; Smith et al., 2001).”
• Corporate Social Responsibility Practices in Developing and Transitional Countries: Botswana and Malawi (2009, background): “Various empirical studies have provided support, particularly in the U.S. context (Aupperle et al., 1985; Burton et al., 2000; Pinkston and Carroll, 1996; Smith et al., 2001).”
• The pyramid of corporate social responsibility model: empirical evidence from Malaysian stakeholder perspectives / Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki and Tengku Farrah Maimunah Tengku Mohd Yusof (2008, methodology): “…adopted in the literature specifically on testing the Carroll conceptualization of CSR (Ibrahim & Angelidis, 1995; Pinkston & Carroll, 1996; Edmondson & Carroll, 1999; Smith et al, 2001; Ibrahim et al, 2003; Marz et. al, 2003; Smith et al, 2004; Angelidis & Ibrahim, 2004; Ibrahim & Parsa, 2005).”