The Evolution of Intraindustry Firm Heterogeneity: Insights From a Process Study

By Tomo Noda, David J. Collis. 2001

179 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b6f3c7ef942a7e0758b7b8db31ce43ace41ef630

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Strategic Entrepreneurs at Work: The Nature, Discovery, and Exploitation of Entrepreneurial Opportunities (2007, background): “Numerous studies have documented the importance of initial sets of users for entrepreneurial firms in the development of new product innovations (e.g., Holbrook et al., 2000; Noda and Collis, 2001).”
Organizational Capabilities, Patterns of Knowledge Accumulation and Governance Structures in Business Firms: An Introduction (2008, background): “7 See, among others, Rumelt 1991; Davis et al. 1996; Baldwin 1995; Haltiwanger 2000; Nelson 1991; Dosi 1988; Bartelsman and Doms 2000; Foster et al. 2001; Noda and Collis 2001.”
The Co-evolution of Capabilities and Transaction Costs: Explaining the Institutional Structure of Production (2005, background): “The literature on capabilities, and recent empirical work (Lieberman and Dhawan, 2001; Collis and Noda, 2001), indicates that the typical situation in an industry, especially early in a technology or industry’s life cycle, is that firms have heterogeneous productive capabilities.”
Barriers to e-commerce and competitive business models in developing countries: A case study (2007, background): “Economic barriers Positive economic feedback occurs in the presence of increasing returns to scale [19].”
Dynamic Creation: Extending the Radical Austrian Approach to Entrepreneurship (2010, background): “We offer the DC approach as a provisional alternative perspective of entrepreneurship that will naturally change as this approach grows and evolves.”
Standing out: how new firms in emerging markets build reputation (2007, background): “…we acknowledge that initial differences in entrepreneurial visions and resource (Burton et al., 2002) and local market conditions, which past research has related to differences in firms’ competitive positions (Noda and Collis, 2001), were not directly included in the scope of our investigation.”
“What’s Past Is Prologue” (2015, background): “…that imprinting occurs at sensitive periods other than founding, such as CEO succession and turnover (White et al., 1997), entry into a new market or industry (Dowell & Swaminathan, 2006; Noda & Collis, 2001), or external disruption, crisis, and shock (Dieleman, 2010; Dixon et al., 2007).”
Explaining the Clustering of International Expansion Moves: A Critical Test in the U.S. Telecommunications Industry (2005, background): “Although their competitive strategies began to diverge slowly after the AT&T break-up (Noda & Collis, 2001), their common heritage, technology, and market position similarities made them a natural comparison group for managers, the shareholders, and the financial community (Noda & Bower, 1996;…”
Puttin' on the Ritz: Pre-Ipo Enlistment of Prestigious Affiliates as Deadline-Induced Remediation (2008, background): “This is because holding a disadvantaged position at critical points in firms’ developments can create “path dependencies” (Noda & Collis, 2001; Stinchcombe, 1965) that translate into unfavorable positions in the future.”