‘Slaughtering this beautiful math’: graduate women choosing and leaving mathematics

By Abbe H. Herzig. 2004

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, General Health Professions, Human Factors and Ergonomics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5ce31fe0a10d0f4577835722dfc9f636772936b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Susan K. Gardner
2. Y. Solomon
3. Rachael D. Robnett
4. H. Roos
5. Einat Heyd‑Metzuyanim
6. K. Pyhältö
7. Rachel Lambert
8. J. Keskinen

In General Health Professions

1. Susan K. Gardner
2. Y. Solomon
3. Rachael D. Robnett
4. K. Pyhältö
5. J. Keskinen

In Human Factors and Ergonomics

1. Susan K. Gardner
2. Y. Solomon
3. Rachael D. Robnett

Citations in the corpus

• Student and faculty attributions of attrition in high and low-completing doctoral programs in the United States (2009, background): “…Nettles and Millett 2006), attrition and gender (e.g., Berg and Ferber 1983; Herzig 2004b; Maher et al. 2004), attrition and race (e.g., Ellis 2001; Herzig 2004a; Margolis and Romero 1998), attrition within particular disciplines (e.g., Bowen and Rudenstine 1992; Golde 2005; Nettles and Millett…”
• Gender Bias in STEM Fields (2016, background): “Women in STEM undergraduate majors and STEM graduate programs also report experiencing gender bias (Etzkowitz, Kemelgor, & Uzzi, 2000; Herzig, 2004; Margolis, Fisher, & Miller, 2000; Steele, James, & Barnett, 2002).”
• Finding a voice? Narrating the female self in mathematics (2012, background): “This pattern is an international one, as Forgasz, Becker, Lee and Steinthorsdottir's (2010) book demonstrates, and it demands an understanding of women's own self-positioning as “not belonging” in the world of mathematics, even when they are successful in it at both undergraduate (Solomon, 2007a) an”