Enjoying new ways to work: An HRM process approach to study flow

By Pascale Peters, E. Poutsma, Beatrice van der Heijden, Arnold B. Bakker, T. D. Bruijn. 2014

160 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b558e7b951357c01682f8661e1c74956e062696a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Claudia Baudewijns
2. Ruud Gerards
3. Göran Kecklund
4. Gunnar Aronsson
5. Andries de Grip
6. C. Mellner

In Social Psychology

1. Claudia Baudewijns
2. Ruud Gerards
3. Göran Kecklund
4. Gunnar Aronsson
5. Andries de Grip
6. C. Mellner

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Claudia Baudewijns
2. Ruud Gerards
3. Göran Kecklund
4. Gunnar Aronsson
5. Andries de Grip
6. C. Mellner

Citations in the corpus

• Boundary Management Preferences, Boundary Control, and Work-Life Balance among Full-Time Employed Professionals in Knowledge-Intensive, Flexible Work (2015, background): “As such, they can be said to have high time-spatial flexibility (Peters et al., 2009, 2014).”
• Do new ways of working increase work engagement (2018, background): “Here, we build on Peters et al. (2014), who investigate the impact of NWW on work-related flow in a few specific job categories across multiple organizations.”