Managing innovation and change : a critical guide for organizations

By N. King, Neil Anderson. 2002

253 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b525c7d3f562cadc4aec1f2146d48ee36f261aa2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Identifying key determinants for new product introductions and firm performance in small service firms (2005, background): “A focus on continuous renewal may prove helpful in aligning innovative efforts [Amabile, 1988; King and Anderson, 2002].”
Leadership predictors of innovation and task performance: Subordinates' self‐esteem and self‐presentation as moderators (2009, background): “Taking into account previous research demonstrating that innovation varies with employees’ overall work experience and organizational tenure (King & Anderson, 2002; Scott & Bruce, 1994), these two variables were also considered.”
Innovative Work Behavior: Measurement and Validation (2008, methodology): “This distinction draws on the widely used two-stage (initiation vs. implementation) representation of the innovation process (e.g. Zaltman et al., 1973; King and Anderson, 2002).”
How leaders influence employees' innovative behaviour (2007, background): “The first stage ends with the production of an idea, while the second stage ends as soon as the idea is implemented (King and Anderson, 2002).”
Multilevel Readiness to Organizational Change: A Conceptual Approach (2013, background): “They also identified similar ways in which teams function to resist change, which are team solidarity, rejection of outsiders, conformity to norms, conflict and team insight (King & Anderson, 1995, 2002).”
Creative industries in the netherlands: structure, development, innovativeness and effects on urban growth (2008, background): “The BPS employs a much broader definition; innovation is defined as all implemented products and processes which are new to the firm and the aim of which is to provide some kind of benefit (cf. King and Anderson 2002).”