Comparing Big Givers and Small Givers: Financial Correlates of Corporate Philanthropy

By Bruce Seifert, Sara A. Morris, Barbara R. Bartkus. 2003

350 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4e16c6c002ed49cb6b8587db6f5791e6d744899

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

1. John Stakeley
2. A. Gan
3. Jigao Zhu
4. Werner D. Kristjanpoller
5. C. Peng
6. Marcel C. Minutolo
7. Alfredo De Massis
8. Zabihollah Rezaee

In Marketing

1. Xing-qiang Du
2. John Stakeley
3. A. Gan
4. Jigao Zhu
5. Werner D. Kristjanpoller
6. C. Peng
7. Norhayah Zulkifli
8. R. Muhamad

In Strategy and Management

1. Xing-qiang Du
2. Quan Zeng
3. Wei Jian
4. Yingjie Du
5. Ran Zhang
6. Wentao Feng
7. John Stakeley
8. Jinsong Tan

Citations in the corpus

• The Effects of Firm Size and Industry on Corporate Giving (2007, background): “Seifert et al. (2003), p. 208) reported a weak positive relationship between available cash and corporate giving, suggesting an ‘‘ebb and flow according to the cash cushion a firm has at any point in time.’’”
• The Impact of Public Scrutiny on Corporate Philanthropy (2006, background): “philanthropic generosity and financial performance. Seifert, Morris and Bartkus (2003)”
• Corporate Philanthropic Giving, Advertising Intensity, and Industry Competition Level (2010, background): “Firm cash resources available are also positively related to firm donation decisions, in line with the finding in the literature that firms with higher cash resources are more likely to be involved in CPG activities (Crampton and Patten, 2008; Seifert et al., 2003).”
• An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm (2010, neutral): “be enhanced through \strategic philanthropy" ( Seifert, Morris, and Bartkus 2003 ) to support”
• Corporate social responsibility disclosure and its relation on institutional ownership: Evidence from public listed companies in Malaysia (2010, background): “The prior studies conducted by Gardiner et al. (2003) and Seifert et al. (2003) stated that the size of a business is an important variable in CSR, and acts as a barometer as to why a company engages in CSR activities.”
• Exploring environmental, social, and governance disclosure effects on the S&P 500 financial performance (2019, methodology): “As a measure of size, we chose to measure firm sales (Wang & Sarkis, 2017) and the number of employees (Lee et al., 2016).”
• The Effect of Corporate Social Performance on Financial Performance: The Moderating Effect of Ownership Concentration (2013, background): “However, still others have reported no relationship at all (e.g., Moore 2001; Seifert et al. 2003; Soana 2011).”
• Corporate Philanthropic Disaster Response and Ownership Type: Evidence from Chinese Firms’ Response to the Sichuan Earthquake (2009, background): “Campbell et al. (2002) and Seifert et al. (2003) provide comprehensive outlines of the many empirical research studies, critiques, and reviews that have examined motivations for CPDR. Generally speaking, the literature suggests four possible motivations for CPDR: strategic, political, altruistic,…”
• Religion, the Nature of Ultimate Owner, and Corporate Philanthropic Giving: Evidence from China (2014, background): “Extant studies, especially those published in the Journal of Business Ethics, focus on the determinations and economic consequences of corporate philanthropy (e.g., File and Prince 1998; Gao et al. 2012; Sánchez 2000; Mitschow 2000; MacDonald et al. 2002; Morris et al. 2003; Williams 2003; Brammer a”