The Effects of Firm Size and Industry on Corporate Giving

By Louis H. Amato, Christie H. Amato. 2007

304 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e56746ec70801410406e566efd7c1d4260dc142

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Sociology and Political Science

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Determinants of Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Emission Disclosure: An Empirical Investigation on Turkish Firms (2018, background): “However, among these items, the most commonly used one is total assets [99,102–105].”
Religion, the Nature of Ultimate Owner, and Corporate Philanthropic Giving: Evidence from China (2014, methodology): “2 because prior studies (e.g., Useem 1988; Meznar and Nigh 1995; Brammer and Millington 2006; Amato and Amato 2007) find that firm size is significantly positively associated with corporate philanthropic giving.”
Corporate social responsibility and earnings management in U.S. banks (2014, background): “(6): EBIT (Orlitzky, Schmidt, & Rynes, 2003); SIZE (Amato & Amato, 2007; Scholtens, 2009); MB (Benson & Davidson, 2010); LEV (Gainet, 2010); and INTA (Surroca, Tribo, & Waddock, 2010).”
In the name of charity: Political connections and strategic corporate social responsibility in a transition economy (2015, background): “Finally, we include year and industry dummies to control for reputation and other variations across industries (Amato and Amato, 2007; Seifert et al., 2003; Useem, 1988).”
Financial resource availability and corporate social responsibility expenditures in a sub‐Saharan economy: The institutional difference hypothesis (2013, methodology): “…and O’Bannon, 1997; Saiia, Carroll, and Buchholtz, 2003; Seifert, Morris, and Bartkus, 2004; Waddock and Graves, 1997), and more recent researchers still investigate its posited relationships and employ the theory’s logic (Amato and Amato, 2007; Brammer and Millington, 2008; Surroca et al., 2010).”
The Institutionalization of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (2017, background): “Organizational slack enables the firm to engage in certain strategies (Bourgeois, 1981), as well as socially responsible behaviors (Amato & Amato, 2006; McGuire, Sundgren, & Schneeweis, 1988; Roberts, 1992; Ullmann, 1985).”
Internationalization strategy, firm resources and the survival of SMEs in the export market (2014, methodology): “…likely to be victim to reporting bias in the SME context than, for instance, equity/debt ratios (Fan & Phan, 2007), they are valid and previously established indicators of slack resources (Amato & Amato, 2007; Mishina et al., 2004), and reflect the concept of slack resources by Bourgeois (1981).”