Exploring environmental, social, and governance disclosure effects on the S&P 500 financial performance

By Marcel C. Minutolo, Werner D. Kristjanpoller, John Stakeley. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2019

198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Much of the literature measuring the relationship between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores and firm performance treats the score as a measure of sustainability performance. In this study, we treat a firm's ESG score as a demonstration of strategic choice in the level of transparency that results in increased firm performance as measured by Tobin's Q and return on assets. Performance differences are a result of choice moderated by the size of the firm as measured by employees and sales. We analyze 467 firms in the S&P 500 from 2009 to 2015. Applying legitimacy and stakeholder theory, we find that there is significant difference between groups with respect to disclosure and performance. The results of quartile analysis by sales, capitalization, and Tobin's Q are relevant to understand the influence that the ESG score has on financial performance. ESG influences onTobin's Q are greatest for large firms as measured by sales, as opposed to the ESG affects onTobin's Q and return on asset for smallest firms as measured by market capitalization.

Subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/95011e71744f950664d00beab371cd2baed7718b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

  1. Lina Liu
  2. Fen Zhang
  3. Xiaonan Qin

In Strategy and Management

  1. Lina Liu
  2. Fen Zhang
  3. Xiaonan Qin

Citations in the corpus