Meta-Analysis of Math Interventions for Students With Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

By T. Templeton, R. Neel, Erika Blood. 2008

81 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b33247a56cf34aa0fdaa3f7d7c62fd59b172ef4f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. M. Burns
2. G. Lukito
3. Robin S. Codding
4. R. Kubina
5. James D. Stocker
6. Christopher H. Skinner

In Psychiatry and Mental health

1. M. Burns
2. G. Lukito
3. Robin S. Codding

In Statistics and Probability

1. G. Lukito
2. M. Burns
3. Robin S. Codding
4. James D. Stocker
5. R. Kubina

Citations in the corpus

• Meta–Analysis of Mathematic Basic–Fact Fluency Interventions: A Component Analysis (2011, methodology): “Templeton et al. (2008) used percentage of nonoverlap-ping data points, a single-case design effect sized metric that has been criticized by some as being influenced by outliers (Parker & Hagan-Burke, 2007) and its inability to differentiate between treatments (Parker, Hagan-Burke, & Vannest, 2007).”