Institutional Analysis and the Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility

By John L. Campbell. 2006

554 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2d993d868b7e692af646ee254dacc8f33ab95fe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Corporate social responsibility reporting in the cruise tourism industry: a performance evaluation using a new institutional theory based model (2016, methodology): “However, many authors point out that monitoring and enforcement are among the weakest points of CSR in the sector (Campbell, 2006).”
The Effects of CSR on Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty in China: The Moderating Role of Corporate Image (2015, unknown): “In the words of Campbell [10] “CSR sets a minimum behavioral standard that aims at doing no harm to stakeholders and if it has happened then rectifies it as soon as it is identified”.”
Environmental Innovations, Local Networks and Internationalization (2012, background): “In these contexts, the CSR international agenda overrides local needs (on this point see, e.g. Campbell, 2006).”
‘Free Us Up So We Can Be Responsible!’ The Co-Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and Neo-Liberalism in the UK, 1977-2010 (2012, background): “A growing literature does address CSR’s institutional determinants (Campbell, 2006; Midttun et al., 2006; Matten and Moon, 2008; Gjølberg, 2009; Jackson and Apostolakou, 2010) as well as its historical evolution (Frederick, 2006; Carroll, 2008; Moon et al., 2010).”
The influence of coercive isomorphism on corporate social responsibility reporting and reputation (2011, background): “However, there is a limited body of research focusing on the relationship between CSR reporting and reputation in this region ( Campbell, 2006”
Small Business Owners' Success Criteria, a Values Approach to Personal Differences1 (2011, background): “However, other researchers assume that actors are motivated by logics of both instrumentality and appropriateness (Campbell 2006), which may mean that both objectives would be equally important.”
Under Positive Pressure (2016, background): “Mimetic isomorphism in this regard can even be identified in the early 20th century among nationally organized business associations (Campbell, 2006, 2007; Oliver, 1991).”
A Study of Management Perceptions of the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organisational Performance in Emerging Economies: The Case of Dubai (2008, background): “Given that firms in emerging economies are embedded in different business systems from those of western firms, research on the association between CSR and organisational performance in emerging economies is warranted (Aguilera et al., 2007; Campbell, 2006).”
Is Corporate Responsibility Converging? A Comparison of Corporate Responsibility Reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany (2009, background): “Campbell (2006) argues that corporations are more likely to behave in a socially responsible way, the more they encounter strong state regulation, collective industrial selfregulation, NGOs, and other independent organizations that monitor them and a normative institutional environment that encourag”
Corporate Social Responsibility, Product Differentiation Strategy and Export Performance (2010, background): “Campbell, 2006; Doh and Guay, 2006; Husted and Allen, 2006). In their theoretical work, Matten and Moon (2008) argued that institutional differences across countries explain why firms adopt explicit approaches to CSR in liberal laissez-faire countries (such as the USA) and implicit approaches in col”
An Institutional Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility in Kenya (2011, background): “The question of why corporations act in socially responsible ways in different national contexts has intrigued ‘business and society’ scholars (see Campbell, 2006, 2007; Matten and Moon, 2008).”
Corporate Social Responsibility and Gender Diversity: Insights from Asia Pacific (2017, background): “Campbell (2006) argues that the way corporations view their stakeholders depends on the institutional and structural constraints within which they operate.”