An Institutional Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility in Kenya

By Judy N. Muthuri, Victoria Gilbert. 2011

331 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Anthropology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e551784fa652951ac7b9d1866206c1c024ad4ab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Anthropology

1. Vijaya. Thyil
2. Gregory Jackson
3. Waris Ali
4. S. Young
5. J. Frynas

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Arno Kourula
2. N. Pisani
3. R. Meijer
4. J. Frynas
5. Ans Kolk
6. Waris Ali
7. Dirk Matten
8. Gregory Jackson

In Strategy and Management

1. J. Frynas
2. Ans Kolk
3. Arno Kourula
4. N. Pisani
5. Dirk Matten
6. R. Meijer
7. Waris Ali
8. S. Young

Citations in the corpus

• Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries as an Emerging Field of Study (2018, neutral): “…literature where CSR is conceptualized as a complex phenomenon that is contextual and multimodal and often initiated in collaboration with others inside and outside the corporation (e.g. Lund-Thomsen and Nadvi 2010a; Maloni and Brown 2006; Muller and Kolk 2009; Muthuri and Gilbert 2011; Yu 2008).”
• Role of Country- and Firm-Level Determinants in Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure (2016, neutral): “Thus, previous studies have employed this theory to explain the influences of countrylevel characteristics on corporate behavior in terms of ESG disclosure (Jackson and Apostolakou 2010; Muthuri and Gilbert 2011; Oliver 1991).”
• How global is international CSR research? Insights and recommendations from a systematic review (2017, background): “…growth of CSR practices in these regions, with a particular emphasis on the role of the civil society and the host government ’ s commitment (e.g., Muthuri & Gilbert, 2011; Mzembe & Meaton, 2014), as well as the in-stitutional-level e ff ects of CSR outcomes, particularly in relation to local…”
• Corporate Social Responsibility and Institutional Theory: New Perspectives on Private Governance (2012, background): “Drawing on the ‘country-of-origineffect’ in institutional theory (Harzing and Noorderhaven, 2003), it is evident that quite a number of CSR practices reflect norms and values of Western democracies, but have led to wide-ranging changes in institutions in so-called developing countries (Muthuri and G”
• Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure in Developed and Developing Countries: A Literature Review (2017, result): “…in developing countries (Williams, 1999; Kamla, 2007; Wanderley et al. , 2008), consistent with the argument made in prior studies which argued that CSR is a socially constructed and dynamic concept (Carroll, 1979; Jones, 1980; McWilliams & Siegel, 2001; Campbell, 2007; Muthuri & Gilbert, 2011).”
• Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance: Role of Context in International Settings (2013, methodology): “This method of using company listings and non-random samples has been supported by previous studies (see Muthuri and Gilbert 2010, p. 471).”
• The Role of Normative CSR‐Promoting Institutions in Stimulating CSR Disclosures in Developing Countries (2018, background): “…Gallego-Álvarez and Quina-Custodio, 2017), but – with reference to DiMaggio & Powell’s (1983) typology – notable among them are normative pressures including from educational institutions, professional associations and social movement organizations (Levy & Kolk, 2002; Muthuri & Gilbert, 2011).”
• Institutional legitimacy and norms-based CSR marketing practices: Insights from MNCs operating in a developing economy (2015, background): “These approaches are being vigorously pursued to investigate the impact of MNCs in underdeveloped economies ( Jamali and Neville, 2011; Muthuri and Gilbert, 2011; Wiig and Kolstad, 2010).”