‘Free Us Up So We Can Be Responsible!’ The Co-Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and Neo-Liberalism in the UK, 1977-2010
By Daniel P. Kinderman. 2012
248 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Finance, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29c28bf25058ae2157deb189300a17be4e8bdb38
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Finance
In Political Science and International Relations
- Steven A. Brieger
- Dirk Matten
- Timo Meynhardt
- Gregory Jackson
- Stephen Brammer
- Ruth V. Aguilera
- B. Amable
- Abdul Rasheed
In Sociology and Political Science
- Dirk Matten
- Steven A. Brieger
- Timo Meynhardt
- Gregory Jackson
- Stephen Brammer
- Dima Jamali
- Ruth V. Aguilera
- J. Moon
Citations in the corpus
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Institutional Theory: New Perspectives on Private Governance (2012, background): “In his analysis of the UK, Kinderman (2012) shows how the emergence of business activity promoting CSR was deeply bound together with the rise of neoliberal economic policies associated with Margaret Thatcher in the 1980s.”
- Government Policies for Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe: Support and Institutionalization (2013, unknown): “Reflecting Crouch’s (2005) distinction between two institutional complementarities, CSR is understood to fit in with domestic institutional structures by either ‘substituting’ (Jackson and Apostolakou, 2010; Kinderman, 2012; Matten and Moon, 2008) or ‘mirroring’ (Campbell, 2007; Gjølberg, 2009) exta”
- Too Much of a Good Thing? On the Relationship Between CSR and Employee Work Addiction (2019, background): “As CSR helps companies gain legitimacy and avoid criticism, it is used by companies to preempt government regulation and control (Kinderman 2011).”