Willingness-to-pay for safety improvements in the German meat sector: the case of the Q&S label
By U. Enneking. 2004
143 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Marketing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b1b3c121a09155489ab49da7cd352970f54f0e36
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Wim Verbeke
- W. Umberger
- Maria Loureiro
- J. Roosen
- K. Grunert
- K. Foster
- Carolina Liljenstolpe
- Ana Angulo
In General Decision Sciences
- Carolina Liljenstolpe
- Ana Angulo
- J. Gil
- Maria Loureiro
- K. Foster
- Wim Verbeke
- David Ubilava
- J. Roosen
In Marketing
- Wim Verbeke
- K. Grunert
- Carolina Liljenstolpe
- Ana Angulo
- J. Gil
- Maria Loureiro
- K. Foster
- David Ubilava
Citations in the corpus
- Evaluating animal welfare with choice experiments: an application to Swedish pig production (2005, background): “Enneking (2004) investigates the wtp for quality assurance schemes that has been introduced in German meat sector by the use of a random parameter logit model.”
- Risk perception and consumer willingness to pay for certified beef in Spain (2007, background): “Recent studies have explored consumers’ preferences for mandatory and voluntary beef labelling programs associated with credence attributes (Alfnes and Rickersten, 2003; Lusk et al., 2001; Roosen, Lusk and Fox, 2003; Enneking, 2004; Loureiro and Umberger, 2004).”
- Quality Certification vs. Product Traceability: Consumer Preferences for Informational Attributes of Pork in Georgia * (2009, background): “[6,7,8]), there are additional challenges in NIS economies, because the institutions that would ordinarily carry out such activities may not be well-developed or may not be trustworthy in the eyes of the consumers making them less willing to pay for a governmental label.”
- Market Differentiation Potential of Country-of-origin, Quality and Traceability Labeling (2009, background): “The focus on generic food products is interesting, since this product category may suffer from higher risk perception, higher quality uncertainty and stronger information asymmetries, e.g., relative to premium branded products (Enneking, 2004).”
- A choice experiment model for beef: What US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability (2007, background): “Therefore, EU traceability systems, which have existed since the 1990s, not only provide enhanced food safety and consumer confidence, but they also help to add value to food products by enhancing food quality through labeling of experience and credence attributes (Buhr, 2003; Bureau and Valceschini”
- Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand (2005, methodology): “…and Nardella, 2000; Gil et al., 2000; Maruyama and Kikuchi, 2004), experimental auctions (Hoffman et al., 1993; Lusk et al., 2001, 2004; Rozan et al., 2004) and conjoint analysis (e.g. Bech-Larsen and Grunert, 2003; Enneking, 2004; Grunert et al., 2004) have been the most popular methods.”