Evaluating animal welfare with choice experiments: an application to Swedish pig production

By Carolina Liljenstolpe. 2005

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, Small Animals

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87b75fc094fe0115fcdc2bbb40a354c2aaf42cfa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Marketing

In Small Animals

Citations in the corpus

The Role of the Beneficiary in Willingness to Pay for Socially Responsible Products: A Meta-Analysis (2014, unknown): “…No 2006.3 No No 75.0 52.0 No T-shirts Clothing 3.97 Environment No 2006.3 No No 79.0 54.0 No T-shirts Clothing 3.97 Environment No 2006.3 No No 81.0 62.0 Liljenstolpe (2008) Yes Pork fillet Food 4.24 Animals No 2004.3 No Yes – 13.0 Yes Pork fillet Food 4.24 Animals No 2004.3 No Yes – 15.0 Yes…”
Importance of health and environment as quality traits in the buying decision of organic products (2009, methodology): “…model, the Multinomial Logit model, assumes an identical and independently distributed (iid) Gumbel distributed error term (Train, 2003 in Liljenstolpe, 2005), with the following choice probability (equation 3): (3) As described by Liljenstolpe (2005), the conditional Multinomial Logit…”
Measuring the consumer benefits of improving farm animal welfare to inform welfare labelling (2012, background): “Thirdly, choice experiments on farm animal welfare have asked respondents to trade-off, for example, different levels of stocking density measured in m(2)/100kg (Liljenstolpe, 2008); or periods of ventilation and darkness (McVittie et al.”
Consumer liking and willingness to pay for high welfare animal-based products (2010, background): “, 2007; Chilton, Burgess, & Hutchinson, 2006) and, within the animal species, to different aspects of animal welfare (Liljenstolpe, 2008).”
Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare Attributes: The Case of Gestation Crates (2009, background): “A few studies have focused on consumer valuations of “animal friendly” products (Lusk, Nilsson, and Foster, 2007; Carlsson, Frykblom, and Lagerkvist, 2007b and 2007c; Lijenstolpe, 2008; Nilsson, Foster, and Lusk, 2006).”
SEGMENTATION BASED ON CONSUMERS' PERCEIVED IMPORTANCE AND ATTITUDE TOWARD FARM ANIMAL WELFARE * (2007, background): “However, many studies have criticised claimed consumer willingness to pay, referring to the duality between consumers and citizen (Korthals 2001; Bennett, Anderson, and Blaney 2002; Carlsson, Frykblom, and Lagerkvist 2004; Liljenstolpe 2005).”
The economics of Integrated Multi‐Trophic Aquaculture: where are we now and where do we need to go? (2020, background): “Reviews in Aquaculture (2020) 12, 1579–1594 © 2020 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd1588 & Vlosky 2007; Liljenstolpe 2008), helping producers price their new products more accurately (Kannan et al. 2008), providing the basis for public policy recommendations (Roe et al. 2001; Onyango et al. 2005;…”