Lexical Access in Bilingual Speech Production: Evidence from Language Switching in Highly Proficient Bilinguals and L2 Learners.
By Albert Costa, M. Santesteban. 2004
924 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b13dd99a708784d4e3438301d34ae214bc925853
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Ellen Bialystok
- Debra Titone
- Judith F. Kroll
- David W. Green
- K. Paap
- Albert Costa
- Shari R. Baum
- O. Sawi
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Ellen Bialystok
- Debra Titone
- Judith F. Kroll
- David W. Green
- K. Paap
- Shari R. Baum
- Albert Costa
- O. Sawi
Citations in the corpus
- Are bilingual advantages dependent upon specific tasks or specific bilingual experiences? (2014, background): “…may be stronger for highly fluent and balanced bilinguals, the mechanism for resolving the competition between translation equivalents may become automatic and more reliant on language-specific mechanisms within the bilingual lexicon (Costa & Santesteban, 2004; Costa, Santesteban, & Ivanova, 2006).”
- Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control (2007, background): “Highly-proficient bilinguals show no asymmetry when switching between L1 and a less proficient third language, L3 (Costa & Santesteban, 2004) or between L2 and L3 (Costa, Santesteban, & Ivanaova, 2006).”
- Individual differences in L2 acquisition of English phonology: The relation between cognitive abilities and phonological processing☆ (2015, neutral): “…& Weekes, 2008), and processing speed (Golestani, Molko, Dehaene, LeBihan, & Pallier, 2007) have been associatedwith higher L2 proficiency andmore efficient L2 processing (see also Costa & Santesteban, 2004; Festman, Rodriguez-Fornells, & Münte, 2010; Rodriguez-Fornells, Balaguer, & Münte, 2006).”
- Natural codeswitching knocks on the laboratory door (2006, background): “…is a clear explanation for observed differences in reaction times across the bilingual’s languages when the switch of a single word is part of a full clause is still open for discussion, at least based on findings in Costa and Santesteban (2004) and discussions in Costa (2005) and Meuter (2005).”
- Is language control just a form of executive control? Evidence for overlapping processes in language switching and task switching☆☆☆ (2017, neutral): “However, this has been attributed to the bilinguals being late or early bilinguals with respect to L1 and L2 (cf. Costa & Santesteban, 2004).”
- Language switching in picture naming: What asymmetric switch costs (do not) tell us about inhibition in bilingual speech planning (2013, background): “…that highly proficient bilinguals do not use inhibition to switch between languages and that inhibition is specific to less proficient L2 learners (Costa & Santesteban, 2004; Costa et al., S W IT C H C O S T S 5 7 1 2006).1 Does the absence of asymmetry in switching between languages argue…”
- Bilingual Minds (2009, background): “Specifically, when given the option to use either language, unbalanced bilinguals switch languages in a manner that resembles a more balanced-bilingual profile of language switching (i.e., no switch-cost asymmetry; Costa & Santesteban, 2004; Costa et al., 2006).”
- Digits vs. pictures: The influence of stimulus type on language switching (2012, background): “For example, Costa and Santesteban (2004) tested highly proficient bilinguals in a language switching setting and found a reduction of language switch costs with a long CSI (see also Verhoef, Roelofs & Chwilla, 2009).”
- Control mechanisms in bilingual language production: Neural evidence from language switching studies (2008, background): “For instance, when individuals are asked to switch between naming a digit in one language compared with another there is a ‘switch cost’ (Costa & Santesteban, 2004; Jackson, Swainson, Cunnington, & Jackson, 2001; Macnamara, Krauthammer, & Bolgar, 1968; Meuter & Allport, 1999; Philipp, Gade, & Koch,…”
- Where is the bilingual advantage in task-switching? (2013, neutral): “…use of language-switching paradigms to explore the mechanisms involved in bilingual language control (e.g. Christoffels, Firk, & Schiller, 2007; Costa & Santesteban, 2004; Costa, Santesteban, & Ivanova, 2006; Finkbeiner, Almeida, Janssen, & Caramazza, 2006; Jackson, Swainson, Cunnington, &…”
- Age-related effects over bilingual language control and executive control* (2013, background): “…generally show a symmetrical language switch cost, that is the same cost when switching from L1 into L2 and vice versa (Calabria et al., 2011; Costa & Santesteban, 2004; Costa et al., 2006), a pattern of switch cost that is not usually found in low-proficient bilinguals (e.g., Meuter &…”
- LEARNING SECOND LANGUAGE SUPRASEGMENTALS: Effect of L2 Experience on Prosody and Fluency Characteristics of L2 Speech (2006, background): “…and efficient functioning of several psycholinguistic mechanisms at multiple levels of processing ~Munro & Derwing, 2001!, including those of lexical access ~Costa & Santesteban, 2004!, grammatical encoding ~Segalowitz & Frenkiel-Fishman, 2005!, and conversion of a speech plan into…”
- Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: evidence from the ANT task. (2008, background): “This is an interesting observation that parallels some results obtained with the language switching task ( Costa & Santesteban, 2004; Costa et al., 2006a).”
- Task switching: interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. (2010, neutral): “This was the case in conflict- and choice-RT tasks, (M. Hübner, Kluwe, Luna-Rodriguez, & Peters, 2004; Monsell, Yeung, & Azuma, 2000), in language switching (Costa & Santesteban, 2004; Hernandez & Kohnert, 1999), and in saccadic tasks, (Reuter, Philipp, Koch, & Kathmann, 2006).”
- Inhibitory control predicts language switching performance in trilingual speech production* (2011, methodology): “A number of studies have used a variant of the picturenaming task reported in the present study (e.g., Costa & Santesteban, 2004; Schwieter & Sunderman, 2008).”