Bilingual Minds

By Ellen Bialystok, Fergus I. M. Craik, David W. Green, Tamar H. Gollan. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2009

632 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dfde8f38e650983a96bdcc6f36561cca9f5a8ef6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Individual differences in inhibitory control relate to bilingual spoken word processing* (2013, background): “…inhibitory processes during language processing as the mechanisms behind the development of non-verbal cognitive advantages in bilinguals reported in the literature (e.g., Bialystok et al., 2009; Bialystok et al., 2004; Bialystok et al., 2008; Costa et al., 2008; Luk, De Sa & Bialystok, 2011).”
Executive control in bilinguals: A concise review on fMRI studies. (2016, neutral): “…speculated that the activation of the caudate nucleus as an area RESOLVING CONFLICT arises from processing verbal and non-verbal stimuli (Bialystok, Craik, Green & Gollan, 2009), and the activation in the posterior cingulate gyrus is associated with the role of WORKING MEMORY in the particular…”
Bilingualism and Cognition (2018, background): “Bilingual individuals may develop their cognitive shifting controls since their language-switching practice can also be applied to non-linguistic shifting tasks (Prior & MacWhinney, 2010; Mehrani & Zabihi, 2017). Mehrani and Zabihi (2017) found that early bilingual children displayed a certain bilin”
Language switching in picture naming: What asymmetric switch costs (do not) tell us about inhibition in bilingual speech planning (2013, background): “predicted switch costs, with slower naming latencies on switch than on nonswitch trials. They also showed the predicted asymmetry, with larger switch costs to the dominant L1 than to the nondominant L2, supporting the task set inertia hypothesis. Based on these results, Meuter and Allport proposed, ”
Clitic-doubled left dislocation and focus fronting in L2 Spanish: A case of successful acquisition at the syntax–discourse interface (2012, background): “Linguistic inhibition is necessary for bilinguals under the generally accepted idea that all grammars in the mind of bilinguals are simultaneously activated (Kroll et al., 2008; Marian and Spivey, 2003; for a review, see Bialystok et al., 2009).”
Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis (2013, background): “Substantial experimental evidence indicates that in bilingual speakers both languages are active even when only one is being used (see, for reviews, Bialystok et al., 2009; Kroll, Bobb, & Wodniecka, 2006).”