Analysis of Feedback, Enabling Conditions and Fairness Perceptions of Teachers in Three School Districts with New Standards-Based Evaluation Systems

By Steven M. Kimball. 2002

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Information Systems and Management, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/adcff0935413fa776ce9b8dcc98be7890b3eb4e2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Information Systems and Management

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Standards-Based Teacher Evaluation as a Foundation for Knowledge- and Skill-Based Pay (2006, unknown): “Research on the implementation of the systems and teacher reactions can be found in Heneman and Milanowski (2003); Kimball (2002); and Milanowski and Heneman (2001).”
Data-informed curriculum reform: Which data, what purposes, and promoting and hindering factors. (2010, background): “, 2006: Mingchu, 2008; Wayman & Stringfield, 2006a, 2006b), access to accurate and timely data (Kerr et al., 2006; Kimball, 2002; Sharkey & Murnane, 2006; Wayman & Stringfield, 2006b), reliable and valid data (Schildkamp, 2007; Kerr et al.”
Fear, the School Organization, and Teacher Evaluation (2008, background): “However, even in systems that have teacher professional growth as a primary emphasis (Milanowski & Heneman, 2001; Kimball, 2002), studies suggest that there is difficulty with reconciling organizational and individual (teacher) goals.”
Examining Teacher Evaluation Validity and Leadership Decision Making Within a Standards-Based Evaluation System (2009, methodology): “Prior case studies of this district (Kimball, 2001) and districts using similar evaluation systems (Halverson, Kelley, & Kimball, 2004; Kimball, 2002) exposed differences in principals’ motivation to be accurate, their knowledge about instruction and the evaluation system, and school context.”
Examining the Relationship Between Teacher Evaluation and Student Assessment Results in Washoe County (2004, background): “New, standards-based teacher evaluation practices have recently emerged to respond to historical deficiencies in evaluation practices and improve instruction and accountability (Danielson & McGreal, 2000; Davis, Pool, & Mits-Cash, 2000; Kimball, 2002; Milanowski & Heneman, 2001).”
Narrowing in on Educational Resources That Do Affect Student Achievement (2006, methodology): “In 2000, Washoe implemented a standards-based teacher evaluation system closely modeled on Danielson’s (1996) framework for teaching (see also Kimball, 2002, for a description of the program) and soon after began a research relationship with CPRE, sharing evaluation and test score data in exchange…”
The New Educational Accountability: Understanding the Landscape of Teacher Evaluation in the Post-NCLB Era (2016, background): “Time is one of the most consistently cited obstacles to high quality evaluation (Donaldson et al. 2014; Kimball 2002; Krajewski 1978; Peterson 2000; Tucker 1997).”