Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in Higher Education

By Ludmila Praslova. 2010

323 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/abd733e3a1dbba48b02f022e654e92f9373540e9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. V. Taras
2. Aljawharah Alsalamah
3. Fabian Jintae Froese
4. Carol Callinan

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. V. Taras
2. Aljawharah Alsalamah
3. Daniel Rottig
4. Fabian Jintae Froese
5. Riikka M. Sarala
6. Carol Callinan

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. V. Taras
2. Aljawharah Alsalamah
3. Fabian Jintae Froese
4. Riikka M. Sarala
5. Michael S. Minor
6. Fang Zhao
7. Hanoku Bathula
8. Carol Callinan

Citations in the corpus

• A Global Classroom? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Global Virtual Collaboration as a Teaching Tool in Management Education (2013, methodology): “Nonetheless, the model has been widely used by training professionals as a framework to evaluate training effectiveness in an organizational context, which includes evaluating teaching effectiveness in higher education (Praslova, 2010).”
• Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model of Training Criteria to Evaluate Training Programmes for Head Teachers (2021, methodology): “Therefore, the results criteria in education might include a wide range of outcomes, such as alumni employment and succession in the workplace, admission to tertiary education, servicing of underprivileged groups, working to promote peace and justice, responsible citizenship, literary or artistic ac”