The Role of Feedback During Academic Testing: The Delay Retention Effect Revisited
By R. Dihoff, G. Brosvic, Michael L. Epstein. 2003
132 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a9874477beaba4fe13044c7d185d7e38ce52c2db
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Valerie J. Shute
- H. Roediger III
- Andrew C. Butler
- Jeffrey D. Karpicke
- David Boud
- Christian D. Schunn
- Heidi L. Andrade
- F. M. Van der Kleij
Citations in the corpus
- Provision of Feedback During Preparation For Academic Testing: Learning Is Enhanced by Immediate But Not Delayed Feedback (2004, background): “For example, in Dihoff et al. (2003), students completed classroom examinations using response formats that provided feedback after each response, at the end of a test, or after a 24-hr delay.”
- Focus on Formative Feedback (2007, background): “In general, there is wide support for use of immediate feedback to promote learning and performance on verbal, procedural, and even tasks requiring motor skills (Anderson et al., 2001; Azevedo & Bernard, 1995; Corbett & Anderson, 1989, 2001; Dihoff et al., 2003; Phye & Andre, 1989).”
- The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests. (2007, background): “As discussed in the introduction, previous studies that found a superiority of answer-until-correct feedback have often naturally confounded type and timing of feedback (e.g., Angell, 1949; Dihoff et al., 2003; Dihoff et al., 2004; Sullivan et al., 1971).”