Stakeholder mismanagement and corporate social responsibility crises

By Ans Kolk, J. Pinkse. 2006

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8ccc908bb2ddd7071ca3e841b5c52db4bd8b021

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

1. P. Perego
2. Ans Kolk
3. J. Pinkse
4. Valentina Marano
5. T. Kostova
6. R. van Tulder
7. Arno Kourula
8. N. Pisani

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. P. Perego
2. Ans Kolk
3. R. van Tulder
4. B. Ackers
5. N. Eccles

In Strategy and Management

1. P. Perego
2. Ans Kolk
3. J. Pinkse
4. R. van Tulder
5. Arno Kourula
6. N. Pisani
7. David L. Levy
8. K. Maas

Citations in the corpus

• Sustainable Bonuses: Sign of Corporate Responsibility or Window Dressing? (2014, background): “At the same time, the Netherlands has historically been a stakeholder-oriented country, known for its ‘polder model’, a social system of collaborative decision-making that highly values consultation and includes concern for a range of stakeholder interests (Kolk and Pinkse, 2006).”
• A Cognitive Perspective on the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability (2015, unknown): “Extant literature contains many examples of the consequences firms have had to face because of mismanaged stakeholder relations (Kolk and Pinkse, 2006), and typically proposes extensive stakeholder dialogue as a means to mitigate it (Van Huijstee and Glasbergen, 2008).”