Distinguishing Between Good (Useful) and Bad Workloads on Students’ Evaluations of Teaching
By Herbert W. Marsh. 2001
109 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8c63a09212eaf7afdeca5fc6adae18762c54a3b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- S. Young
- D. Mortelmans
- P. Spooren
- Bert Brockx
- Torstein Låg
- Rannveig Grøm Sæle
- Kristy S. Cooper
- Adam Driscoll
Citations in the corpus
- Will Teachers Receive Higher Student Evaluations by Giving Higher Grades and Less Course Work? (2003, background): “The importance of this distinction was underscored by Marsh (2001), who found that good hours were related to student evaluations and students' perceptions of their learning, whereas bad hours were negatively related to these same factors.”
- Student Ratings of Teaching : A Summary of Research and Literature (2012, unknown): “However, Marsh (2001) re-analyzed their data and found two nearly uncorrelated components of workload: “bad workload” (time spent that was not valuable) and “good workload” (i.e., time spent on activities related to instructional objectives).”
- ‘Time is not enough.’ Workload in higher education: a student perspective (2014, unknown): “For example, Marsh (2001) emphasises the time aspect by distinguishing between good, useful workload and ‘ bad ’ workload.”
- Does the Flipped Classroom Improve Student Learning and Satisfaction? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2019, background): “…arise when there is a discrepancy between what students perceive to be an appropriate workload and the real workload entailed by the most effective teaching methods (Centra, 2003; Greenwald & Gillmore, 1997), or when workload is perceived to be not germane to instructional objectives (Marsh, 2001).”
- What’s in a Name: Exposing Gender Bias in Student Ratings of Teaching (2015, background): “A large portion of research on student ratings of teaching directly utilized those ratings for their data (e.g. Basow, 1995; Bennett, 1982; Centra, 2007; Centra & Gaubatz, 2000; Marsh, 2001).”
- Eliciting Engagement in the High School Classroom (2014, methodology): “90 (Marsh, 2001) in every model.”
- Student Views of Effective Online Teaching in Higher Education (2006, background): “Students’ evaluations of instruction are valid and reliable, according to researchers such as Greenwald and Gillmore (1997) and Marsh (2001).”
- On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching (2013, background): “Such studies have also rejected the hypothesis concerning the existence of a negative (and thus biasing) relationship between course workload and SET (Marsh, 2001; Marsh & Roche, 2000).”