Being There: Work Engagement and Positive Organizational Scholarship
By Nancy P. Rothbard, Shefali V. Patil. 2011
109 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8b5cd99181f3202de1e6525e27cdbd70c09f506
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- L. Eldor
- E. Vigoda-Gadot
- J. Busser
- Heerae Kang
- Francesca Gino
- P. Green
- Eli J. Finkel
- Gráinne M. Fitzsimons
Citations in the corpus
- Impact of service climate and psychological capital on employee engagement: The role of organizational hierarchy (2018, background): “Engaged employees are more passionate, energetic, and dedicated to their organization than disengaged employees (Rothbard and Patil, 2011); thus, they are willing to go beyond the normal expectations of their job, increasing work performance and satisfaction.”
- The nature of employee engagement: rethinking the employee–organization relationship (2017, background): “Scholars generally define employee engagement as an active, fulfilling and work-related state of mind that includes a strong identification with the organization and self-expression (Albrecht, 2010a; Bakker, Albrecht, & Leiter, 2011; Rothbard & Patil, 2010).”
- The Energizing Nature of Work Engagement: Toward a New Need-Based Theory of Work Motivation (2017, methodology): “For example, they suggest that “one can be engaged in something because it is a problem to be solved, and this can be associated with negative affect; or, one can be engaged in an activity that is joyful” (Rothbard & Patil, 2012: 60).”