Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis

314 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Meta-analysis in Second Language Research: Choices and Challenges (2010, background): “Although the fail-safe N has been calculated in SLA meta-analyses (Abraham, 2008; Adesope et al., 2009; Ross, 1998), it is not a very precise measure of publication bias (Becker, 2005).”
Computer‐Assisted Language Learning Trends and Issues Revisited: Integrating Innovation (2009, background): “…that students will, in fact, use them in the way or to the extent that developers intend; only carefully structured assignments and followup work can effectively promote such use (see Fischer , 2007, for a discussion of research tracking how students use CALL features; see also Abraham , 2008).”
Intercultural communicative competence and online exchanges: a systematic review (2018, background): “…Handley, & Walter, 2011; Sauro, 2011; Taylor, 2006, 2009; Wang & V asquez, 2012; Zhao, 2003), and most of them belong to the meta-analyses strand (Abraham, 2008; Lin, 2014; Lin et al., 2013; Taylor, 2006, 2009; Zhao, 2003), with the exception of a single systematic review (Macaro, Handley, &…”