Explanation-Driven Inquiry: Integrating Conceptual and Epistemic Scaffolds for Scientific Inquiry

By William A. Sandoval, Brian J. Reiser. 2004

744 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4d5fc8707982b80855e51dfada328c69efda32c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Theoretical and Pedagogical Perspectives on Orchestrating Creativity and Collaborative Learning. (2011, background): “In this way, the members of the group need to explain different points of view, argue their own position and negotiate to find the joint solution (see also Sandoval & Reiser, 2004).”
Making sense of argumentation and explanation (2009, methodology): “Another common approach is to support students in constructing explanations that can be defended with evidence (e.g., McNeill, Lizotte, Krajcik, & Marx, 2006; Sandoval & Reiser, 2004; Suthers, Toth, & Weiner, 1997; Zembal-Saul, Munford, Crawford, Friedrichsen, & Land, 2002).”
Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006) (2007, background): “…should include not only conceptual and procedural knowledge but also the flexible thinking skills and the epistemic practices of the domain that prepare students to be lifelong learners and adaptive experts (Bereiter & Scardamalia, 2006; Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 2000; Sandoval & Reiser, 2004).”
Argument to Foster Scientific Literacy (2010, methodology): “Similar directional scaffolds were provided with the computer program ExplanationConstructor (Sandoval & Millwood, 2005; Sandoval & Reiser, 2004).”
Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (2011, background): “Learning to execute throwing skills in a complex learning environment is coupled with both learning to catch and the understanding of catching in complex game environments.”
Support of the collaborative inquiry learning process: influence of support on task and team regulation (2012, methodology): “The Explanation Builder (Sandoval and Reiser 2004) and the Collaborative Hypothesis Tool (Saab 2005) are examples of tools that support both the inquiry learning process as well as the collaborative process.”
The Effect of Inquiry-Based Learning Method on Students' Academic Achievement in Science Course. (2014, neutral): “[18] Sandoval, W.”
Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments (2005, methodology): “... research methods have been utilized widely, including technology-supported inquiry learning (TSIL; Edelson, Gordin & Pea, 1999), Web-based inquiry science environment (WISE) and its forerunner knowledge integration environment (KIE; Bell & Linn, 2000; Linn, Clark, & Slotta, 2003; Linn, Davis, & ”
Developing Learning Theory by Refining Conjectures Embodied in Educational Designs (2004, background): “In a second study, returning to a school we had worked with previously, we found that students were able to appropriate evidentiary cri- teria to evaluate their own and their peers’ explanations (Sandoval & Reiser, 2004).”