The Good Judge Revisited: Individual Differences in the Accuracy of Personality Judgments

By Neil D. Christiansen, Shaina Wolcott-Burnam, Jay E. Janovics, Gary N. Burns, Stuart W. Quirk. 2005

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4b11333f541fcbfbf28a8ef03017fc824cf0309

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Jill E. Ellingson
2. Cornelius J. Konig
3. Marise Ph. Born
4. Lynn A. McFarland

In Social Psychology

1. Cornelius J. Konig
2. Marise Ph. Born
3. Lynn A. McFarland
4. Jill E. Ellingson

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jill E. Ellingson
2. Cornelius J. Konig
3. Marise Ph. Born
4. Markus Langer
5. Lynn A. McFarland

Citations in the corpus

• Understanding Faking Behavior Through the Lens of Motivation: An Application of VIE Theory (2011, background): “Christiansen, Wolcott-Burnam, Janovics, Burns, and Quirk (2005 ) refined this notion by synthesizing three distinct declarative knowledge structures to create the construct of “dispositional intelligence.”
• Psychology Meets Machine Learning: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Algorithmic Job Candidate Screening (2018, background): “Among these researchers are Christiansen et al. (2005), who used the term dispositional reasoning to label individual differences between judges in their complex knowledge of how traits relate to each other and to behaviors, and of situations’ 222 C. C. S. Liem et al. potential to elicit traits…”