Beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder: The Impact of Organizational Identification, Identity, and Image on the Cooperative Behaviors of Physicians
By J. Dukerich, Brian R. Golden, Stephen M. Shortell. 2002
930 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a3c9d9c9e17b9d949cde7594f2a49a1120c37a42
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Fred Walumbwa
- Blake E. Ashforth
- Weichun Zhu
- Bruce J. Avolio
- Thomas W. H. Ng
- David M. Mayer
- Abraham Carmeli
- Adam M. Grant
In Social Psychology
- Fred Walumbwa
- Blake E. Ashforth
- Bruce J. Avolio
- Weichun Zhu
- S. Cartwright
- David M. Mayer
- Peng Wang
- Sophie Bacq
Citations in the corpus
- Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions (2008, background): “For discussions of identification measures, see Edwards (2005), Haslam (2004), and Riketta (2005). 2.”
- Testing and extending the group engagement model: linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. (2009, neutral): “In particular, they suggest that a primary way in which economic outcomes may affect behavior is through their impact on social identity, which helps explain earlier observations that social identity can trigger many of the same effects as economic incentives (Dukerich et al., 2002).”
- A Behavioral Theory of Social Performance: Social Identity and Stakeholder Expectations (2017, background): “Other means to specify organizational identification include survey scales (Bergami & Bagozzi, 2000; Dukerich et al., 2002), alumni status (Mael & Ashforth, 1992; Zavyalova et al., 2016), or consumer involvement (Traylor, 1981).”
- How leadership enhances employees’ knowledge sharing: the intervening roles of relational and organizational identification (2011, background): “A favorable organizational image is a key to the development of organizational identification and commitment (e.g., Carmeli 2005; Dukerich et al. 2002; Smidts et al. 2001).”
- The diffusion of foreign divestment from Burma (2014, background): “Unocal was involved in the construction of a 416-mile long natural gas 5 For research on how organizational image motivates organizational strategy and action, see Dukerich, Golden, and Shortell (2002) and Whetten and Mackey (2002).”
- Positive Organizational Scholarship (2007, neutral): “Dutton (1993) argued that framing issues as opportunities (as an illustration of a positive categorization and interpretation of issues) is potent psychologically and organizationally because it: 1) increases a sense of control; 2) increases positive affect; 3) suppresses threat, which increases sea”
- The effects of the perceived external prestige of the organization on employee deviant workplace behavior: The mediating role of job satisfaction (2016, background): “A positive organizational image or a positive perception plays an integral role in employees’ strong identification with and commitment to an organization (Carmeli, 2005a; Carmeli et al., 2006; Dukerich et al., 2002; Dutton and Dukerich, 1991; Dutton et al., 1994; Mael and Ashforth, 1992; Smidts et ”
- Egoistic norms, organizational identification, and the perceived ethicality of unethical pro-organizational behavior: A moral maturation perspective (2020, background): “Organizational identification is a part of employees’ social identity; when individuals see a cognitive link between themselves and their workplace, their organizational identity is considered particularly salient (Dukerich et al., 2002).”
- Effects of Reputation, Relational Satisfaction, and Customer–Company Identification on Positive Word-of-Mouth Intentions (2009, background): “Consequently, a variety of research has shown the relationship between identification with an organization and the favorable reputation of that organization (Bhattarcharya & Elsbach, 2002; Dukerich, Golden, & Shortell, 2002 ; Mael & Ashforth, 1992 ; Reade, 2001 ; Smidts, Pruyn, & van Riel, 2001 ”