(S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity theory: Understanding second language learners as people
By James Lantolf. 2014
265 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a21c532124f047ac25ea4b52d0ea2afa2caf5338
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Christina L. Isabelli-García
- Jennifer Bown
- Dan Dewey
- J. Plews
- A. Jiang
- Lawrence Jun Zhang
- Anne Feryok
- Ángels Llanes
Citations in the corpus
- Language learning and study abroad (2018, background): “…to learners and learning argued for a view of learners as agents who ‘actively engage in constructing the terms and conditions of their own learning’ (Lantolf & Pavlenko 2001: 145) and who make choices about how they will participate—or not participate––in communities and practices they encounter.”
- Chinese students’ perceptions of English learning affordances and their agency in an English-medium instruction classroom context (2019, background): “In particular, this study draws attention to student agency, the essential role of which in language learning is well-recognised not least in sociocultural theory (Gao 2010; Lantolf and Pavlenko 2001; Toohey and Norton 2003).”
- Activity Theory and Language Teacher Agency. (2012, background): “This view makes agency “a contextually enacted way of being in the world” (van Lier, 2008), involving both what is done and how it is understood to be significant (Lantolf & Pavlenko, 2001).”