New Participant Role Scales: comparison between various criteria for assigning roles and indications for their validity

By F. Goossens, T. Olthof, P. Dekker. 2006

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9fbb2107ac1235c0f8b230338ad7bab4538cc18b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Predictors of student defenders of peer aggression victims: Empathy and social cognitive factors (2011, background): “Although moderate cross-time stability between roles has been demonstrated (Goossens et al., 2006; Salmivalli et al., 1998), no research has examined the contribution of empathy and social cognitive factors to defending behavior above and beyond stability of defending over time.”
Victims and their defenders: A dyadic approach (2011, background): “Defenders identified by peer reports are generally liked (Goossens et al., 2006; Pöyhönen & Salmivalli, 2008; Salmivalli et al., 1996) and, at least in middle childhood, perceived as popular (Caravita et al.”
Bullying Participant Behaviors Questionnaire (BPBQ): Establishing a Reliable and Valid Measure (2016, background): “Still, others have examined multiple methods for classification of participant roles such a z-scores and percentage cut-offs and determined there is no gold standard for classification of participant roles (Goossens et al., 2006).”
The Longitudinal Interplay between Bullying, Victimization, and Social Status: Age-related and Gender Differences (2015, result): “These results put findings from previous cross-sectional research (Goossens et al., 2006; Salmivalli et al., 1996; Vaillancourt et al., 2003) in a different perspective, as these findings are often interpreted as peer rejection (or low acceptance) being the result of bullying.”
What Does It Take to Stand Up for the Victim of Bullying?: The Interplay Between Personal and Social Factors (2010, background): “Both likeability (Caravita et al.; Goossens et al., 2006; Salmivalli et al., 1996) and perceived popularity (Caravita et al.”
Bullying and the Need to Belong: Early Adolescents' Bullying‐Related Behavior and the Acceptance they Desire and Receive from Particular Classmates (2007, methodology): “To assess children’s involvement in bullying we used the new participant role scale (NPRS) (Goossens et al., 2006), which is a translated and adapted © Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2007 Social Development, 17, 1, 2008 32-item version of Salmivalli et al.’s (1996) peer nomination procedure.”